How to Stay Curious while avoiding Noisy TVs using Aleatoric Uncertainty Estimation
Augustine N. Mavor-Parker, Kimberly A. Young, Caswell Barry, Lewis D. Griffin
Abstract
When extrinsic rewards are sparse, artificial agents struggle to explore an environment. Curiosity, implemented as an intrinsic reward for prediction errors, can improve exploration but it is known to fail when faced with action-dependent noise sources ('noisy TVs'). In an attempt to make exploring agents robust to noisy TVs, we present a simple solution: aleatoric mapping agents (AMAs). AMAs are a novel form of curiosity that explicitly ascertain which state transitions of the environment are unpredictable, even if those dynamics are induced by the actions of the agent. This is achieved by generating separate forward predictions for the mean and aleatoric uncertainty of future states, with the aim of reducing intrinsic rewards for those transitions that are unpredictable. We demonstrate that in a range of environments AMAs are able to circumvent actiondependent stochastic traps that immobilise conventional curiosity driven agents. Furthermore, we demonstrate empirically that other common exploration approaches-previously thought to be immune to agent-induced randomness-can be trapped by stochastic dynamics. Code to reproduce our experiments is provided.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f1de99d9-302c-4f52-af8f-d9696a05fd24Cited by top-tier papers11
- Attentive Experience ReplayPeiquan Sun, Wengang Zhou, Houqiang LiAAAI 2020 · 62 citations
- Wonder Wins Ways: Curiosity-Driven Exploration through Multi-Agent Contextual CalibrationYiyuan Pan, Zhe Liu, Hesheng WangNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- Centralized Reward Agent for Knowledge Sharing and Transfer in Multi-Task Reinforcement LearningHaozhe Ma, Zhengding Luo, Thanh Vinh Vo, Kuankuan Sima et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- Curiosity in Hindsight: Intrinsic Exploration in Stochastic EnvironmentsDaniel Jarrett, Corentin Tallec, Florent Altché, Thomas Mesnard et al.ICML 2023 · 3 citations
- Beyond Noisy-TVs: Noise-Robust Exploration Via Learning Progress MonitoringZhibo Hou, Zhiyu An, Wan DuICLR 2026 · 3 citations
Builds on2
- Never Give Up: Learning Directed Exploration StrategiesAdrià Puigdomènech Badia, Pablo Sprechmann, Alex Vitvitskyi, Zhaohan Daniel Guo et al.ICLR 2020 · 349 citations
- RIDE: Rewarding Impact-Driven Exploration for Procedurally-Generated EnvironmentsRoberta Raileanu, Tim RocktäschelICLR 2020 · 198 citations
Related papers
- Curiosity-Driven Exploration via Latent Bayesian SurprisePietro Mazzaglia, Ozan Çatal, Tim Verbelen, Bart DhoedtAAAI 2022 · 44 citations
- Implicit Generative Modeling for Efficient ExplorationNeale Ratzlaff, Qinxun Bai, Fuxin Li, Wei XuICML 2020 · 15 citations
- ELDEN: Exploration via Local DependenciesZizhao Wang, Jiaheng Hu, Peter Stone, Roberto Martín-MartínNeurIPS 2023 · 15 citations
- Sequential Generative Exploration Model for Partially Observable Reinforcement LearningHaiyan Yin, Jianda Chen, Sinno Jialin Pan, Sebastian TschiatschekAAAI 2021 · 7 citations
- Two Heads are Better Than One: A Simple Exploration Framework for Efficient Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningJiahui Li, Kun Kuang, Baoxiang Wang, Xingchen Li et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 7 citations
