Literature Meets Data: A Synergistic Approach to Hypothesis Generation
Haokun Liu, Yangqiaoyu Zhou, Mingxuan Li, Chenfei Yuan, Chenhao Tan
Abstract
AI holds promise for transforming scientific processes, including hypothesis generation. Prior work on hypothesis generation can be broadly categorized into theory-driven and data-driven approaches. While both have proven effective in generating novel and plausible hypotheses, it remains an open question whether they can complement each other. To address this, we develop the first method that combines literature-based insights with data to perform LLM-powered hypothesis generation. We apply our method on five different datasets and demonstrate that integrating literature and data outperforms other baselines (8.97% over few-shot, 15.75% over literature-based alone, and 3.37% over data-driven alone). Additionally, we conduct the first human evaluation to assess the utility of LLM-generated hypotheses in assisting human decision-making on two challenging tasks: deception detection and AI generated content detection. Our results show that human accuracy improves significantly by 7.44% and 14.19% on these tasks, respectively. These findings suggest that integrating literature-based and data-driven approaches provides a comprehensive and nuanced framework for hypothesis generation and could open new avenues for scientific inquiry.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- Paper2Rebuttal: A Multi-Agent Framework for Transparent Author Response AssistanceQianli Ma, Chang Guo, Zhiheng Tian, Siyu Wang et al.ACL 2026 · 6 citations
- HypoEval: Hypothesis-Guided Evaluation for Natural Language GenerationMingxuan Li, Hanchen Li, Chenhao TanACL 2026 · 1 citation
- LightWM: Training-Free Hierarchical Working Memory for Small Language Model AgentsZiyi Wang, Haonan Jin, Zian Wang, Wendong Wang et al.ICML 2026
- On the Role of Model Prior in Real-World Inductive ReasoningZhuo Liu, Ding Yu, Hangfeng HeEMNLP 2025
Builds on13
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own GenerationsArjun Panickssery, Samuel R. Bowman, Shi FengNeurIPS 2024 · 865 citations
- MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning ExperimentationQian Huang, Jian Vora, Percy Liang, Jure LeskovecICML 2024 · 209 citations
- Phenomenal Yet Puzzling: Testing Inductive Reasoning Capabilities of Language Models with Hypothesis RefinementLinlu Qiu, Liwei Jiang, Ximing Lu, Melanie Sclar et al.ICLR 2024 · 114 citations
- InfiAgent-DABench: Evaluating Agents on Data Analysis TasksXueyu Hu, Ziyu Zhao, Shuang Wei, Ziwei Chai et al.ICML 2024 · 110 citations
Related papers
- Hidden in Plain Sight: Evaluation of the Deception Detection Capabilities of LLMs in Multimodal SettingsMd Messal Monem Miah, Adrita Anika, Xi Shi, Ruihong HuangACL 2025
- HypER: Literature-grounded Hypothesis Generation and Distillation with ProvenanceRosni Vasu, Chandrayee Basu, Bhavana Dalvi Mishra, Cristina Sarasua et al.EMNLP 2025
- DEMASQ: Unmasking the ChatGPT WordsmithKavita Kumari, Alessandro Pegoraro, Hossein Fereidooni, Ahmad-Reza SadeghiNDSS 2024
- OpenDeception: Learning Deception and Trust in Human–AI Interaction via Multi-Agent SimulationYichen Wu, Qianqian Gao, Xudong Pan, Geng Hong et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- DiscoveryBench: Towards Data-Driven Discovery with Large Language ModelsBodhisattwa Prasad Majumder, Harshit Surana, Dhruv Agarwal, Bhavana Dalvi Mishra et al.ICLR 2025
