Multi-turn Reinforcement Learning with Preference Human Feedback
Lior Shani, Aviv Rosenberg, Asaf B. Cassel, Oran Lang, Daniele Calandriello, Avital Zipori, Hila Noga, Orgad Keller, Bilal Piot, Idan Szpektor, Avinatan Hassidim, Yossi Matias, Rémi Munos
Abstract
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has become the standard approach for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences, allowing LLMs to demonstrate remarkable abilities in various tasks. Existing methods work by emulating the preferences at the single decision (turn) level, limiting their capabilities in settings that require planning or multi-turn interactions to achieve a long-term goal. In this paper, we address this issue by developing novel methods for Reinforcement Learning (RL) from preference feedback between two full multi-turn conversations. In the tabular setting, we present a novel mirror-descent-based policy optimization algorithm for the general multi-turn preference-based RL problem, and prove its convergence to Nash equilibrium. To evaluate performance, we create a new environment, Education Dialogue, where a teacher agent guides a student in learning a random topic, and show that a deep RL variant of our algorithm outperforms RLHF baselines. Finally, we show that in an environment with explicit rewards, our algorithm recovers the same performance as a reward-based RL baseline, despite relying solely on a weaker preference signal.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers13
- GRPO-Guard: Mitigating Implicit Over-Optimization in Flow Matching via Regulated ClippingJing Wang, Jiajun Liang, Jie Liu, Henglin Liu et al.CVPR 2026 · 46 citations
- Expanding the Capabilities of Reinforcement Learning via Text FeedbackYuda Song, Lili Chen, Fahim Tajwar, REMI MUNOS et al.ICML 2026 · 41 citations
- Fine-Grained GRPO for Precise Preference Alignment in Flow ModelsYujie Zhou, Pengyang Ling, Jiazi Bu, Yibin Wang et al.CVPR 2026 · 19 citations
- Ask a Strong LLM Judge when Your Reward Model is UncertainZhenghao Xu, Qin Lu, Qingru Zhang, Liang Qiu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- Achieving Logarithmic Regret in KL-Regularized Zero-Sum Markov GamesAnupam Nayak, Tong Yang, Osman Yagan, Gauri Joshi et al.ICML 2026 · 9 citations
Builds on20
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Preference Ranking Optimization for Human AlignmentFeifan Song, Bowen Yu, Minghao Li, Haiyang Yu et al.AAAI 2024 · 357 citations
- Nash Learning from Human FeedbackRémi Munos, Michal Valko, Daniele Calandriello, Mohammad Gheshlaghi Azar et al.ICML 2024 · 212 citations
Related papers
- Improving LLM General Preference Alignment via Optimistic Online Mirror DescentYuheng Zhang, Dian Yu, Tao Ge, Linfeng Song et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 27 citations
- Doubly Robust Alignment for Large Language ModelsErhan Xu, Kai Ye, Hongyi Zhou, Luhan Zhu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- MPO: An Efficient Post-Processing Framework for Mixing Diverse Preference AlignmentTianze Wang, Dongnan Gui, Yifan Hu, Shuhang Lin et al.ICML 2025
- Real-Time Aligned Reward Model beyond SemanticsZixuan Huang, Xin Xia, Yuxi Ren, Jianbin Zheng et al.ICML 2026 · 18 citations
- Stackelberg Learning from Human Feedback: Preference Optimization as a Sequential GameBarna Pásztor, Thomas Kleine Buening, Andreas KrauseICLR 2026 · 9 citations
