SignQuery: A Natural User Interface and Search Engine for Sign Languages with Wearable Sensors
Hao Zhou, Taiting Lu, Kristina Mckinnie, Joseph Palagano, Kenneth DeHaan, Mahanth Gowda
Abstract
Search Engines such as Google, Baidu, and Bing have revolutionized the way we interact with the cyber world with a number of applications in recommendations, learning, advertisements, healthcare, entertainment, etc. In this paper, we design search engines for sign languages such as American Sign Language (ASL). Sign languages use hand and body motion for communication with rich grammar, complexity, and vocabulary that is comparable to spoken languages. This is the primary language for the Deaf community with a global population of ≈ 500 million. However, search engines that support sign language queries in native form do not exist currently. While translating a sign language to a spoken language and using existing search engines might be one possibility, this can miss critical information because existing translation systems are either limited in vocabulary or constrained to a specific domain. In contrast, this paper presents a holistic approach where ASL queries in native form as well as ASL videos and textual information available online are converted into a common representation space. Such a joint representation space provides a common framework for precisely representing different sources of information and accurately matching a query with relevant information that is available online. Our system uses low-intrusive wearable sensors for capturing the sign query. To minimize the training overhead, we obtain synthetic training data from a large corpus of online ASL videos across diverse topics. Evaluated over a set of Deaf users with native ASL fluency, the accuracy is comparable with state-of-the-art recommendation systems for Amazon, Netflix, Yelp, etc., suggesting the usability of the system in the real world. For example, the re-call@10 of our system is 64.3%, i.e., among the top ten search results, six of them are relevant to the search query. Moreover, the system is robust to variations in signing patterns, dialects, sensor positions, etc.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get f1cdc8a9-83f2-4712-a345-1aab77afc8d9Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itRelated papers
- WearSign: Pushing the Limit of Sign Language Translation Using Inertial and EMG WearablesQian Zhang, JiaZhen Jing, Dong Wang, Run ZhaoUbiComp 2022 · 26 citations
- Reconstructing Signing Avatars from Video Using Linguistic PriorsMaria-Paola Forte, Peter Kulits, Chun-Hao Huang, Vasileios Choutas et al.CVPR 2023
- Searching for fingerspelled content in American Sign LanguageBowen Shi, Diane Brentari, Greg Shakhnarovich, Karen LivescuACL 2022 · 8 citations
- SignRing: Continuous American Sign Language Recognition Using IMU Rings and Virtual IMU DataJiyang Li, Lin Huang, Siddharth Shah, Sean J. Jones et al.UbiComp 2023 · 27 citations
- Design and Evaluation of Hybrid Search for American Sign Language to English Dictionaries: Making the Most of Imperfect Sign RecognitionSaad Hassan, Akhter Al Amin, Alexis Gordon, Sooyeon Lee et al.CHI 2022 · 19 citations
