Distractor Effects on Crossing-Based Interaction
Huawei Tu, Jin Huang, Hai-Ning Liang, Richard Skarbez, Feng Tian, Henry Been-Lirn Duh
Abstract
Task-irrelevant distractors affect visuo-motor control for target acquisition and studying such effects has already received much attention in human-computer interaction. However, there has been little research into distractor effects on crossing-based interaction. We thus conducted an empirical study on pen-based interfaces to investigate six crossing tasks with distractor interference in comparison to two tasks without it. The six distractor-related tasks differed in movement precision constraint (directional/amplitude), target size, target distance, distractor location and target-distractor spacing. We also developed and experimentally validated six quantitative models for the six tasks. Our results show that crossing targets with distractors had longer average times and similar accuracy than that without distractors. The effects of distractors varied depending on distractor location, target-distractor spacing and movement precision constraint. When spacing is smaller than 11.27 mm, crossing tasks with distractor interference can be regarded as pointing tasks or a combination of pointing and crossing tasks, which could be better fitted with our proposed models than Fitts’ law. According to these results, we provide practical implications to crossing-based user interface design.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get f19ba0ef-b6d3-48f9-87c5-56c3aa8f27f9Related papers
- Modeling the Endpoint Uncertainty in Crossing-based Moving Target SelectionJin Huang, Feng Tian, Xiangmin Fan, Huawei Tu et al.CHI 2020 · 28 citations
- Modeling Temporal Target Selection: A Perspective from Its Spatial CorrespondenceDifeng Yu, Brandon Victor Syiem, Andrew Irlitti, Tilman Dingler et al.CHI 2023 · 16 citations
- Evaluating the Effects of Saccade Types and Directions on Eye Pointing TasksXinyong ZhangUIST 2021 · 4 citations
- Stretch Gaze Targets Out: Experimenting with Target Sizes for Gaze-Enabled Interfaces on Mobile DevicesOmar Namnakani, Yasmeen Abdrabou, Jonathan Grizou, Mohamed KhamisCHI 2025 · 4 citations
- Computing Touch-Point Ambiguity on Mobile Touchscreens for Modeling Target Selection TimesShota Yamanaka, Hiroki UsubaUbiComp 2022 · 5 citations
