MedMCP-Calc: Benchmarking LLMs for Realistic Medical Calculator Scenarios via MCP Integration
Yakun Zhu, Yutong Huang, Shengqian Qin, Zhongzhen Huang, Shaoting Zhang, Xiaofan Zhang
Abstract
Medical calculators are fundamental to quantitative, evidence-based clinical practice. However, their real-world use is an adaptive, multi-stage process, requiring proactive EHR data acquisition, scenario-dependent calculator selection, and multi-step computation, whereas current benchmarks focus only on static single-step calculations with explicit instructions. To address these limitations, we introduce MedMCP-Calc, the first benchmark for evaluating LLMs in realistic medical calculator scenarios through Model Context Protocol (MCP) integration. MedMCP-Calc comprises 118 scenario tasks across 4 clinical domains, featuring fuzzy task descriptions mimicking natural queries, structured EHR database interaction, external reference retrieval, and process-level evaluation. Our evaluation of 23 leading models reveals critical limitations: even top performers like Claude Opus 4.5 exhibit substantial gaps, including difficulty selecting appropriate calculators for end-to-end workflows given fuzzy queries, poor performance in iterative SQL-based database interactions, and marked reluctance to leverage external tools for numerical computation. Performance also varies considerably across clinical domains. Building on these findings, we develop CalcMate, a fine-tuned model incorporating scenario planning and tool augmentation, achieving state-of-the-art performance among open-source models. Benchmark and Codes are available in https://github.com/SPIRAL-MED/MedMCP-Calc.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f15e92df-ca40-4d59-adf1-9dc93f84d7a8Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- GAIA: a benchmark for General AI AssistantsGrégoire Mialon, Clémentine Fourrier, Thomas Wolf, Yann LeCun et al.ICLR 2024 · 716 citations
- TravelPlanner: A Benchmark for Real-World Planning with Language AgentsJian Xie, Kai Zhang, Jiangjie Chen, Tinghui Zhu et al.ICML 2024 · 376 citations
- OSWorld-MCP: Benchmarking MCP Tool Invocation In Computer-Use AgentsHongrui Jia, Jitong Liao, Xi Zhang, Haiyang Xu et al.ICLR 2026 · 24 citations
- MCP-AgentBench: Evaluating Real-World Language Agent Performance with MCP-Mediated ToolsZikang Guo, Benfeng Xu, Chiwei Zhu, Wentao Hong et al.AAAI 2026 · 19 citations
- CMedCalc-Bench: A Fine-Grained Benchmark for Chinese Medical Calculations in LLMYunyan Zhang, Zhihong Zhu, Xian WuEMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
Related papers
- LiveClin: A Live Clinical Benchmark without LeakageXidong Wang, Guo shuqi, Yue Shen, Junying Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- From Scores to Steps: Diagnosing and Improving LLM Performance in Evidence-Based Medical CalculationsBenlu Wang, Iris Xia, Yifan Zhang, Junda Wang et al.EMNLP 2025
- AppWorld-UL: Benchmarking Diverse Agent-User Interactions for Tool-UseJunzhi Chen, Harsh Trivedi, Jane Pan, Michael Zhang et al.ICML 2026
- MCP-Bench: Benchmarking Tool-Using LLM Agents with Complex Real-World Tasks via MCP ServersZhenting Wang, Qi Chang, Hemani Patel, Shashank Biju et al.ICLR 2026 · 109 citations
- MediQ: Question-Asking LLMs and a Benchmark for Reliable Interactive Clinical ReasoningShuyue Stella Li, Vidhisha Balachandran, Shangbin Feng, Jonathan Ilgen et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 215 citations
