The State of Pilot Study Reporting in Crowdsourcing: A Reflection on Best Practices and Guidelines
Jonas Oppenlaender, Tahir Abbas, Ujwal Gadiraju
Abstract
Pilot studies are an essential cornerstone of the design of crowdsourcing campaigns, yet they are often only mentioned in passing in the scholarly literature. A lack of details surrounding pilot studies in crowdsourcing research hinders the replication of studies and the reproduction of findings, stalling potential scientific advances. We conducted a systematic literature review on the current state of pilot study reporting at the intersection of crowdsourcing and HCI research. Our review of ten years of literature included 171 articles published in the proceedings of the Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing (AAAI HCOMP) and the ACM Digital Library. We found that pilot studies in crowdsourcing research (i.e., crowd pilot studies) are often under-reported in the literature. Important details, such as the number of workers and rewards to workers, are often not reported. On the basis of our findings, we reflect on the current state of practice and formulate a set of best practice guidelines for reporting crowd pilot studies in crowdsourcing research. We also provide implications for the design of crowdsourcing platforms and make practical suggestions for supporting crowd pilot study reporting.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f11d9cd1-3f08-4a60-a3be-fd3c1abb86b2Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on29
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- The Psychological Well-Being of Content Moderators: The Emotional Labor of Commercial Moderation and Avenues for Improving SupportMiriah Steiger, Timir J. Bharucha, Sukrit Venkatagiri, Martin J. Riedl et al.CHI 2021 · 168 citations
- Algorithmic Management Reimagined For Workers and By Workers: Centering Worker Well-Being in Gig WorkAngie Zhang, Alexander Boltz, Chun Wei Wang, Min Kyung LeeCHI 2022 · 166 citations
- Quantifying the Invisible Labor in Crowd WorkCarlos Toxtli, Siddharth Suri, Saiph SavageCSCW 2021 · 91 citations
- Whose AI Dream? In search of the aspiration in data annotationDing Wang, Shantanu Prabhat, Nithya SambasivanCHI 2022 · 66 citations
Related papers
- On the State of Reporting in Crowdsourcing Experiments and a Checklist to Aid Current PracticesJorge Ramírez, Burcu Sayin, Marcos Báez, Fabio Casati et al.CSCW 2021 · 4 citations
- Standardizing Reporting of Participant Compensation in HCI: A Systematic Literature Review and Recommendations for the FieldJessica Pater, Amanda Coupe, Rachel Pfafman, Chanda Phelan et al.CHI 2021 · 52 citations
- Mobilizing Crowdwork: A Systematic Assessment of the Mobile Usability of HITsSenjuti Dutta, Rhema Linder, Doug Lowe, Richard Rosenbalm et al.CHI 2022 · 4 citations
- Incorporating Worker Perspectives into MTurk Annotation Practices for NLPOlivia Huang, Eve Fleisig, Dan KleinEMNLP 2023 · 1 citation
- Reproducibility and Replicability of Web Measurement StudiesNurullah Demir, Matteo Große-Kampmann, Tobias Urban, Christian Wressnegger et al.WWW 2022 · 47 citations
