UD-GNN: Uncertainty-aware Debiased Training on Semi-Homophilous Graphs
Yang Liu, Xiang Ao, Fuli Feng, Qing He
Abstract
Recent studies on Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) point out that most GNNs depend on the homophily assumption but fail to generalize to graphs with heterophily where dissimilar nodes connect. The concept of homophily or heterophily defined previously is a global measurement of the whole graph and cannot describe the local connectivity of a node. From the node-level perspective, we find that real-world graph structures exhibit a mixture of homophily and heterophily, which refers to the co-existence of both homophilous and heterophilous nodes. Under such a mixture, we reveal that GNNs are severely biased towards homophilous nodes, suffering a sharp performance drop on heterophilous nodes. To mitigate the bias issue, we explore an Uncertainty-aware Debiasing (UD) framework, which retains the knowledge of the biased model on certain nodes and compensates for the nodes with high uncertainty. In particular, UD estimates the uncertainty of the GNN output to recognize heterophilous nodes. UD then trains a debiased GNN by pruning the biased parameters with certain nodes and retraining the pruned parameters on nodes with high uncertainty. We apply UD on both homophilous GNNs (GCN and GAT) and heterophilous GNNs (Mixhop and GPR-GNN) and conduct extensive experiments on synthetic and benchmark datasets, where the debiased model consistently performs better and narrows the performance gap between homophilous and heterophilous nodes 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers12
- RAGraph: A General Retrieval-Augmented Graph Learning FrameworkXinke Jiang, Rihong Qiu, Yongxin Xu, Wentao Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 42 citations
- FLOOD: A Flexible Invariant Learning Framework for Out-of-Distribution Generalization on GraphsYang Liu, Xiang Ao, Fuli Feng, Yunshan Ma et al.KDD 2023 · 40 citations
- Calibrating Graph Neural Networks from a Data-centric PerspectiveCheng Yang, Chengdong Yang, Chuan Shi, Yawen Li et al.WWW 2024 · 12 citations
- SPEAR: A Structure-Preserving Manipulation Method for Graph Backdoor AttacksYuanhao Ding, Yang Liu, Yugang Ji, Weigao Wen et al.WWW 2025 · 12 citations
- Are Your Models Still Fair? Fairness Attacks on Graph Neural Networks via Node InjectionsZihan Luo, Hong Huang, Yongkang Zhou, Jiping Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations
Builds on16
- Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,935 citations
- Beyond Homophily in Graph Neural Networks: Current Limitations and Effective DesignsJiong Zhu, Yujun Yan, Lingxiao Zhao, Mark Heimann et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 1,490 citations
- Geom-GCN: Geometric Graph Convolutional NetworksHongbin Pei, Bingzhe Wei, Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang, Yu Lei et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,445 citations
- Pick and Choose: A GNN-based Imbalanced Learning Approach for Fraud DetectionYang Liu, Xiang Ao, Zidi Qin, Jianfeng Chi et al.WWW 2021 · 527 citations
- Pre-training Molecular Graph Representation with 3D GeometryShengchao Liu, Hanchen Wang, Weiyang Liu, Joan Lasenby et al.ICLR 2022 · 440 citations
Related papers
- Inductive Subgraphs as Shortcuts: Causal Disentanglement for Heterophilic Graph LearningXiangmeng Wang, Qian Li, Haiyang Xia, Hao Miao et al.SIGIR 2026
- Demystifying Structural Disparity in Graph Neural Networks: Can One Size Fit All?Haitao Mao, Zhikai Chen, Wei Jin, Haoyu Han et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 58 citations
- Revisiting Heterophily For Graph Neural NetworksSitao Luan, Chenqing Hua, Qincheng Lu, Jiaqi Zhu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 351 citations
- Graph Neural Networks with HeterophilyJiong Zhu, Ryan A. Rossi, Anup Rao, Tung Mai et al.AAAI 2021 · 393 citations
- Conflicting Node Discrimination Graph Neural Network for Semi-supervised Node ClassificationWenjun Wang, Xin Cao, Yawen Li, XiaoLong Deng et al.KDD 2026
