Token-Level Self-Play with Importance-Aware Guidance for Large Language Models
Tue Le, Hoang Tran Vuong, Quyen Tran, Linh Van Ngo, Mehrtash Harandi, Trung Le
Abstract
Leveraging the power of Large Language Models (LLMs) through preference optimization is crucial for aligning model outputs with human values. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has recently emerged as a simple yet effective method by directly optimizing on preference data without the need for explicit reward models. However, DPO typically relies on human-labeled preference data, which can limit its scalability. Self-Play Fine-Tuning (SPIN) addresses this by allowing models to generate their own rejected samples, reducing the dependence on human annotations. Nevertheless, SPIN uniformly applies learning signals across all tokens, ignoring the fine-grained quality variations within responses. As the model improves, rejected samples increasingly contain high-quality tokens, making the uniform treatment of tokens suboptimal. In this paper, we propose SWIFT (Self-Play Weighted Fine-Tuning), a fine-grained self-refinement method that assigns token-level importance weights estimated from a stronger teacher model. Beyond alignment, we also demonstrate that SWIFT serves as an effective knowledge distillation strategy by using the teacher not for logits matching, but for reward-guided token weighting. Extensive experiments on diverse benchmarks and settings demonstrate that SWIFT consistently surpasses both existing alignment approaches and conventional knowledge distillation methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f03d3401-1610-40f0-95a0-cdab695d04d2Cited by top-tier papers6
- SRA: Span Representation Alignment for Large Language Model DistillationQuoc Phong Dao, Hoang Son Nguyen, Pham Khanh Chi, Tung Nguyen et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- HieRD: Hierarchical Relational Distillation for Vision-Language Embedding ModelsVinh Le, Nguyen Dang, Tu Vu, Linh Van et al.ICML 2026
- -Divergence Self-Play for Tabular Anomaly Detection via Large Language ModelsHoang Vuong Tran, Linh Van, Dang Nguyen, Thin Nguyen et al.ICML 2026
- TokenRatio: Principled Token-Level Preference Optimization via Ratio MatchingTruong Nguyen, Tien-Phat Nguyen, Linh Van, Duy Nguyen et al.ICML 2026
- -SPPO: Semantic-Calibrated Self-Play Preference OptimizationXiwen Chen, Wenhui Zhu, Jingjing Wang, Peijie Qiu et al.ICML 2026
Builds on19
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
Related papers
- AlignDistil: Token-Level Language Model Alignment as Adaptive Policy DistillationSongming Zhang, Xue Zhang, Tong Zhang, Bojie Hu et al.ACL 2025
- Token-level Direct Preference OptimizationYongcheng Zeng, Guoqing Liu, Weiyu Ma, Ning Yang et al.ICML 2024 · 136 citations
- What Matters in Data for DPO?Yu Pan, Zhongze Cai, Huaiyang Zhong, Guanting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- Dynamic Rewarding with Prompt Optimization Enables Tuning-free Self-Alignment of Language ModelsSomanshu Singla, Zhen Wang, Tianyang Liu, Abdullah Ashfaq et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation
- Token-Importance Guided Direct Preference OptimizationNing Yang, Hai Lin, Yibo Liu, Baoliang Tian et al.ICLR 2026 · 14 citations
