Addressing Optimism Bias in Sequence Modeling for Reinforcement Learning
Adam R. Villaflor, Zhe Huang, Swapnil Pande, John M. Dolan, Jeff Schneider
Abstract
Impressive results in natural language processing (NLP) based on the Transformer neural network architecture have inspired researchers to explore viewing offline reinforcement learning (RL) as a generic sequence modeling problem. Recent works based on this paradigm have achieved state-of-the-art results in several of the mostly deterministic offline Atari and D4RL benchmarks. However, because these methods jointly model the states and actions as a single sequencing problem, they struggle to disentangle the effects of the policy and world dynamics on the return. Thus, in adversarial or stochastic environments, these methods lead to overly optimistic behavior that can be dangerous in safety-critical systems like autonomous driving. In this work, we propose a method that addresses this optimism bias by explicitly disentangling the policy and world models, which allows us at test time to search for policies that are robust to multiple possible futures in the environment. We demonstrate our method's superior performance on a variety of autonomous driving tasks in simulation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f009cde1-89ad-4cd1-940c-ae05065046a6Cited by top-tier papers14
- HIQL: Offline Goal-Conditioned RL with Latent States as ActionsSeohong Park, Dibya Ghosh, Benjamin Eysenbach, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2023 · 173 citations
- Hierarchical Diffusion for Offline Decision MakingWenhao Li, Xiangfeng Wang, Bo Jin, Hongyuan ZhaICML 2023 · 80 citations
- Future-conditioned Unsupervised Pretraining for Decision TransformerZhihui Xie, Zichuan Lin, Deheng Ye, Qiang Fu et al.ICML 2023 · 32 citations
- ACT: Empowering Decision Transformer with Dynamic Programming via Advantage ConditioningChenxiao Gao, Chenyang Wu, Mingjun Cao, Rui Kong et al.AAAI 2024 · 31 citations
- Is Conditional Generative Modeling all you need for Decision Making?Anurag Ajay, Yilun Du, Abhi Gupta, Joshua B. Tenenbaum et al.ICLR 2023 · 31 citations
Builds on13
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement LearningAviral Kumar, Aurick Zhou, George Tucker, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2020 · 2,881 citations
- Decision Transformer: Reinforcement Learning via Sequence ModelingLili Chen, Kevin Lu, Aravind Rajeswaran, Kimin Lee et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 2,557 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- Mastering Atari with Discrete World ModelsDanijar Hafner, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Mohammad Norouzi, Jimmy BaICLR 2021 · 1,170 citations
Related papers
- Offline Reinforcement Learning as One Big Sequence Modeling ProblemMichael Janner, Qiyang Li, Sergey LevineNeurIPS 2021 · 950 citations
- Reinformer: Max-Return Sequence Modeling for Offline RLZifeng Zhuang, Dengyun Peng, Jinxin Liu, Ziqi Zhang et al.ICML 2024 · 29 citations
- M^3PC: Test-time Model Predictive Control using Pretrained Masked Trajectory ModelKehan Wen, Yutong Hu, Yao Mu, Lei KeICLR 2025
- Online Decision TransformerQinqing Zheng, Amy Zhang, Aditya GroverICML 2022 · 256 citations
- Rethinking Decision Transformer via Hierarchical Reinforcement LearningYi Ma, Jianye Hao, Hebin Liang, Chenjun XiaoICML 2024 · 15 citations
