Syntopical Graphs for Computational Argumentation Tasks
Joe Barrow, Rajiv Jain, Nedim Lipka, Franck Dernoncourt, Vlad I. Morariu, Varun Manjunatha, Douglas W. Oard, Philip Resnik, Henning Wachsmuth
Abstract
Approaches to computational argumentation tasks such as stance detection and aspect detection have largely focused on the text of individual claims, losing out on potentially valuable context from the broader collection of text. We present a general approach to these tasks motivated by syntopical reading, a reading process that emphasizes comparing and contrasting viewpoints in order to improve topic understanding. To capture collection-level context, we introduce the syntopical graph, a data structure for linking claims within a collection. A syntopical graph is a typed multi-graph where nodes represent claims and edges represent different possible pairwise relationships, such as entailment, paraphrase, or support. Experiments applying syntopical graphs to stance detection and aspect detection demonstrate stateof-the-art performance in each domain, significantly outperforming approaches that do not utilize collection-level information. Viewpoints (topic, aspect, stance) Syntopical Graph Construction Pairwise judgements are used to as edges in a typed multigraph, where claims and documents are the nodes. . Inputs The newly created graph is then used for stance and aspect detection, to reconstruct viewpoints. A topic and relevant claims extracted from documents.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext efe3e5e8-75a7-41de-902a-2787cc615720Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on4
- Enhancing Cross-target Stance Detection with Transferable Semantic-Emotion KnowledgeBowen Zhang, Min Yang, Xutao Li, Yunming Ye et al.ACL 2020 · 115 citations
- End-to-End Argumentation Knowledge Graph ConstructionKhalid Al Khatib, Yufang Hou, Henning Wachsmuth, Charles Jochim et al.AAAI 2020 · 56 citations
- Unsupervised stance detection for arguments from consequencesJonathan Kobbe, Ioana Hulpus, Heiner StuckenschmidtEMNLP 2020 · 27 citations
- Quantitative argument summarization and beyond: Cross-domain key point analysisRoy Bar-Haim, Yoav Kantor, Lilach Eden, Roni Friedman et al.EMNLP 2020 · 2 citations
Related papers
- Improving Multi-task Stance Detection with Multi-task Interaction NetworkHeyan Chai, Siyu Tang, Jinhao Cui, Ye Ding et al.EMNLP 2022 · 7 citations
- I love pineapple on pizza != I hate pineapple on pizza: Stance-Aware Sentence Transformers for Opinion MiningVahid Ghafouri, Jose Such, Guillermo Suarez-TangilEMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
- Hi-ArG: Exploring the Integration of Hierarchical Argumentation Graphs in Language PretrainingJingcong Liang, Rong Ye, Meng Han, Qi Zhang et al.EMNLP 2023
- Replicate, Walk, and Stop on Syntax: An Effective Neural Network Model for Aspect-Level Sentiment ClassificationYaowei Zheng, Richong Zhang, Samuel Mensah, Yongyi MaoAAAI 2020 · 48 citations
- Argument Pair Extraction with Mutual Guidance and Inter-sentence Relation GraphJianzhu Bao, Bin Liang, Jingyi Sun, Yice Zhang et al.EMNLP 2021 · 14 citations
