Lune

CHI2026Top-tier venue

What Does AI Do for Cultural Interpretation? A Randomized Experiment on Close Reading Poems with Exposure to AI Interpretation

Jiayin Zhi, Hoyt Long, Richard Jean So, Mina Lee

2026Year
1Citations

Abstract

AI demonstrates unprecedented reasoning capabilities, but its increasing integration into human reasoning via automated reading and summarization has provoked debate about its use for cultural interpretation. Close reading-the practice of understanding, analyzing, and critiquing cultural texts for pleasure-is a skill at the core of such interpretation, traditionally being seen as exclusive to humans. To test AI's impact on close reading, both in terms of interpretative performance and pleasure, we conducted a preregistered randomized experiment (𝑛 = 400) investigating the impact of AI assistance by presenting single or multiple AI interpretations, on close reading poems, compared to no AI assistance. We found that single AI interpretation boosted both performance and pleasure, while multiple AI interpretations only improved performance. Further exploration revealed a trade-off: participants who heavily relied on AI showed better performance on the task but lower pleasure. Our results contribute to discussion on whether and how to calibrate AI assistance for cultural interpretation: "less is more. "

• Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI; • Applied computing → Arts and humanities.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on7

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines