What Does AI Do for Cultural Interpretation? A Randomized Experiment on Close Reading Poems with Exposure to AI Interpretation
Jiayin Zhi, Hoyt Long, Richard Jean So, Mina Lee
Abstract
AI demonstrates unprecedented reasoning capabilities, but its increasing integration into human reasoning via automated reading and summarization has provoked debate about its use for cultural interpretation. Close reading-the practice of understanding, analyzing, and critiquing cultural texts for pleasure-is a skill at the core of such interpretation, traditionally being seen as exclusive to humans. To test AI's impact on close reading, both in terms of interpretative performance and pleasure, we conducted a preregistered randomized experiment (𝑛 = 400) investigating the impact of AI assistance by presenting single or multiple AI interpretations, on close reading poems, compared to no AI assistance. We found that single AI interpretation boosted both performance and pleasure, while multiple AI interpretations only improved performance. Further exploration revealed a trade-off: participants who heavily relied on AI showed better performance on the task but lower pleasure. Our results contribute to discussion on whether and how to calibrate AI assistance for cultural interpretation: "less is more. "
• Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in HCI; • Applied computing → Arts and humanities.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on7
- The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge WorkersHao-Ping (Hank) Lee, Advait Sarkar, Lev Tankelevitch, Ian Drosos et al.CHI 2025 · 690 citations
- Does Writing with Language Models Reduce Content Diversity?Vishakh Padmakumar, He HeICLR 2024 · 173 citations
- IMPLI: Investigating NLI Models' Performance on Figurative LanguageKevin Stowe, Prasetya Ajie Utama, Iryna GurevychACL 2022 · 52 citations
- Inform the Uninformed: Improving Online Informed Consent Reading with an AI-Powered ChatbotZiang Xiao, Tiffany Wenting Li, Karrie Karahalios, Hari SundaramCHI 2023 · 48 citations
- Timing Matters: How Using LLMs at Different Timings Influences Writers' Perceptions and Ideation Outcomes in AI-Assisted IdeationPeinuan Qin, Chi-Lan Yang, Jingshu Li, Jing Wen et al.CHI 2025 · 19 citations
Related papers
- KRISTEVA: Close Reading as a Novel Task for Benchmarking Interpretive ReasoningPeiqi Sui, Juan Diego Rodriguez, Philippe Laban, Dean Murphy et al.ACL 2025 · 6 citations
- Impact of Model Interpretability and Outcome Feedback on Trust in AIDaehwan Ahn, Abdullah Almaatouq, Monisha Gulabani, Kartik HosanagarCHI 2024 · 33 citations
- Soliloquy: Fostering Poetry Comprehension Using an Interactive Think-aloud VisualizationZak Risha, Deniz Sonmez Unal, Erin WalkerCHI 2023 · 2 citations
- Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team PerformanceGagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhou, Raymond Fok et al.CHI 2021 · 713 citations
- Understanding and Supporting Peer Review Using AI-reframed Positive SummaryChi-Lan Yang, Alarith Uhde, Naomi Yamashita, Hideaki KuzuokaCHI 2025 · 8 citations
