Fair Division with Social Impact
Michele Flammini, Gianluigi Greco, Giovanna Varricchio
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the problem of fair division of indivisible goods when the allocation of goods impacts society. Specifically, we introduce a second valuation function for each agent, determining the social impact of allocating a good to the agent. Such impact is considered desirable for the society -the higher, the better. Our goal is to understand how to allocate goods fairly from the agents' perspective while maintaining society as happy as possible. To this end, we measure the impact on society using the utilitarian social welfare and provide both possibility and impossibility results. Our findings reveal that achieving good approximations, better than linear in the number of agents, is not possible while ensuring fairness to the agents. These impossibility results can be attributed to the fact that agents are completely unconscious of their social impact. Consequently, we explore scenarios where agents are socially aware, by introducing related fairness notions, and demonstrate that an appropriate definition of fairness aligns with the goal of maximizing the social objective.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext eef5379e-fe56-4bfb-9f00-962943623da9Cited by top-tier papers2
- Dividing Indivisible Items for the Benefit of All: It Is Hard to Be Fair Without Social AwarenessArgyrios Deligkas, Eduard Eiben, Tiger-Lily Goldsmith, Dusan Knop et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- Centralized Group Equitability and Individual Envy-Freeness in the Allocation of Indivisible ItemsYing Wang, Jiaqian Li, Tianze Wei, Hau Chan et al.AAAI 2026
Related papers
- A Little Charity Guarantees Almost Envy-FreenessBhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Telikepalli Kavitha, Kurt Mehlhorn, Alkmini SgouritsaSODA 2020 · 97 citations
- Achieving Proportionality up to the Maximin Item with Indivisible GoodsArtem Baklanov, Pranav Garimidi, Vasilis Gkatzelis, Daniel SchoepflinAAAI 2021 · 15 citations
- Breaking the 3/4 Barrier for Approximate Maximin ShareHannaneh Akrami, Jugal GargSODA 2024 · 26 citations
- Maximizing Nash Social Welfare in 2-Value InstancesHannaneh Akrami, Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Martin Hoefer, Kurt Mehlhorn et al.AAAI 2022 · 31 citations
- Almost Envy-Free Allocations of Indivisible Goods or Chores with EntitlementsMax Springer, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, Hadi YamiAAAI 2024
