USENIX Security2020Top-tier venue
Human Distinguishable Visual Key Fingerprints
Mozhgan Azimpourkivi, Umut Topkara, Bogdan Carbunar
Abstract
Visual fingerprints are used in human verification of identities to improve security against impersonation attacks. The verification requires the user to confirm that the visual fingerprint image derived from the trusted source is the same as the one derived from the unknown source. We introduce CEAL, a novel mechanism to build generators for visual fingerprint representations of arbitrary public strings. CEAL stands out from existing approaches in three significant aspects: (1) eliminates the need for hand curated image generation rules by learning a generator model that imitates the style and domain of fingerprint images from a large collection of sample images, hence enabling easy customizability, (2) operates within limits of the visual discriminative ability of human perception, such that the learned fingerprint image generator avoids mapping distinct keys to images which are not distinguishable by humans, and (3) the resulting model deterministically generates realistic fingerprint images from an input vector, where the vector components are designated to control visual properties which are either readily perceptible to a human eye, or imperceptible, yet necessary for accurately modeling the target image domain.
Unlike existing visual fingerprint generators, CEAL factors in the limits of human perception, and pushes the key payload capacity of the images toward the limits of its generative model: We have built a generative network for nature landscape images which can reliably encode 123 bits of entropy in the fingerprint. We label 3,996 image pairs by 931 participants. In experiments with 402 million attack image pairs, we found that pre-image attacks performed by adversaries equipped with the human perception discriminators that we build, achieve a success rate against CEAL that is at most 2 ×10 -4 %. The CEAL generator model is small (67MB) and efficient (2.3s to generate an image fingerprint on a laptop).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext eee284bf-95e1-45d4-acd2-c70a45142ddbCited by top-tier papers2
- "Get in Researchers; We're Measuring Reproducibility": A Reproducibility Study of Machine Learning Papers in Tier 1 Security ConferencesDaniel Olszewski, Allison Lu, Carson Stillman, Kevin Warren et al.CCS 2023 · 19 citations
- Hop: A Modern Transport and Remote Access ProtocolPaul Flammarion, George Hosono, Wilson Nguyen, Laura Bauman et al.USENIX Security 2026
Builds on2
- How Well Do My Results Generalize? Comparing Security and Privacy Survey Results from MTurk, Web, and Telephone SamplesElissa M. Redmiles, Sean Kross, Michelle L. MazurekS&P 2019 · 222 citations
- An Empirical Study of Textual Key-Fingerprint RepresentationsSergej Dechand, Dominik Schürmann, Karoline Busse, Yasemin Acar et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 65 citations
Related papers
- Attributing Fake Images to GANs: Learning and Analyzing GAN FingerprintsNing Yu, Larry Davis, Mario FritzICCV 2019 · 533 citations
- ImF: Embedding an Implicit Fingerprint in Your Large Language ModelsJiaxuan Wu, Wanli Peng, Hang Fu, Yiming Xue et al.ACL 2026
- Artificial Fingerprinting for Generative Models: Rooting Deepfake Attribution in Training DataNing Yu, Vladislav Skripniuk, Sahar Abdelnabi, Mario FritzICCV 2021 · 305 citations
- Attributing Image Generative Models using Latent FingerprintsGuangyu Nie, Changhoon Kim, Yezhou Yang, Yi RenICML 2023 · 23 citations
- UMMF: Protecting Copyright of Large Vision-Language Models through Unlearning-based Multimodal Memorization FingerprintXiaofan Zheng, Xinghao Wang, Xiaojun WanACL 2026
