Lune

CCS2026Top-tier venue

Rogue: Updatable Matrix Lookup Arguments and Applications to Verifiable Databases

Christodoulos Pappas, Zhuo Cai, Dimitrios Papadopoulos

2026Year

Abstract

Proving the correctness of computations over a large dataset via succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge (SNARKs) entails the large overhead of ``loading'' the dataset in the SNARK. However, certain computations may only need to access a small fraction of the dataset (e.g., a database query that only accesses a subset of table rows and then computes an aggregation function). The standard way of efficiently proving such computations is to use lookup arguments with sublinear prover complexity to load only necessary data to the SNARK. Unfortunately, all prior schemes are static: even a single change to the dataset forces the prover to re-run an expensive pre-processing step, linear to the dataset size. The only exemption is the recent work of Dutta et al., (CCS'24) that proposed a lookup argument with amortized sublinear updates---based on re-running the pre-processing phase periodically, when too many changes have been accumulated. In this work, we present Rogue, the first lookup argument with sublinear prover time and updates that always take time proportional only to the number of incurred changes. Indeed, Rogue is actually a matrix lookup argument, supporting entire row lookups in time proportional to the number of rows (and independent of their size)! It has very good practical performance, e.g., for a 220×272^{20}\times 2^7 matrix and 2102^{10} row accesses, Rogue achieves ×21\times 21-942942 and ×76\times 76-3000030000 faster lookups and updates, respectively, compared to prior works. We then use Rogue to build RogueDB, the first verifiable database system for arbitrary SQL queries that supports authenticated indexes, hence achieves prover time sublinear to the database. Compared with prior schemes with succinct proofs, vSQL (Zhang et al., IEEE S&P'17) and PoneglyphDB (Gu et al., SIGMOD'25), we get ×42.8\times 42.8-×8624.1\times 8624.1 and ×149.6\times 149.6-×11362.4\times 11362.4 faster prover times, for various SQL queries from the TPC-H benchmark.

Ask about this paper

Ask your agent about it.

Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Lunesearch_papers

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers get eed5b7d1-a002-4e13-b5a2-55dd041cfd60

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines