Lune

UIST2020Top-tier venue

Tilt-Responsive Techniques for Digital Drawing Boards

Hugo Romat, Christopher Collins, Nathalie Henry Riche, Michel Pahud, Christian Holz, Adam Riddle, Bill Buxton, Ken Hinckley

2020Year
10Citations
3Top-tier citations

Abstract

Drawing boards offer a self-stable work surface that is continuously adjustable. On digital displays, such as the Microsoft Surface Studio, these properties open up a class of techniques that sense and respond to tilt adjustments. Each display posture-whether angled high, low, or somewhere in-between-affords some activities, but not others. Because what is appropriate also depends on the application and task, we explore a range of app-specific transitions between reading vs. writing (annotation), public vs. personal, shared person-space vs. task-space, and other nuances of input and feedback, contingent on display angle. Continuous responses provide interactive transitions tailored to each use-case. We show how a variety of knowledge work scenarios can use sensed display adjustments to drive context-appropriate transitions, as well as technical software details of how to best realize these concepts. A preliminary remote user study suggests that techniques must balance effort required to adjust tilt, versus the potential benefits of a sensed transition.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext ee83be9a-574e-4225-8eca-44402cd152e2

Cited by top-tier papers3

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on1

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines