LaMDAgent: An Autonomous Framework for Post-Training Pipeline Optimization via LLM Agents
Taro Yano, Yoichi Ishibashi, Masafumi Oyamada
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional performance across a wide range of tasks. To further tailor LLMs to specific domains or applications, post-training techniques such as Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Preference Learning, and model merging are commonly employed. While each of these methods has been extensively studied in isolation, the automated construction of complete post-training pipelines remains an underexplored area. Existing approaches typically rely on manual design or focus narrowly on optimizing individual components, such as data ordering or merging strategies. In this work, we introduce LaMDAgent (short for Language Model Developing Agent), a novel framework that autonomously constructs and optimizes full post-training pipelines through the use of LLM-based agents. LaMDAgent systematically explores diverse model generation techniques, datasets, and hyperparameter configurations, leveraging task-based feedback to discover high-performing pipelines with minimal human intervention. Our experiments show that LaMDAgent improves tool-use accuracy by 9.0 points while preserving instructionfollowing capabilities. Moreover, it uncovers effective post-training strategies that are often overlooked by conventional human-driven exploration. We further analyze the impact of data and model size scaling to reduce computational costs on the exploration, finding that model size scalings introduces new challenges, whereas scaling data size enables cost-effective pipeline discovery.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on23
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIsShishir G. Patil, Tianjun Zhang, Xin Wang, Joseph E. GonzalezNeurIPS 2024 · 1,715 citations
- ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIsYujia Qin, Shihao Liang, Yining Ye, Kunlun Zhu et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,469 citations
Related papers
- AutoML-Agent: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Full-Pipeline AutoMLPatara Trirat, Wonyong Jeong, Sung Ju HwangICML 2025
- Tool-Star: Empowering Multi-Tool Collaborative Web Agent via Reinforcement LearningGuanting Dong, Yifei Chen, Xiaoxi Li, Jiajie Jin et al.SIGIR 2026 · 1 citation
- Scaling Synthetic Task Generation for Agents via ExplorationRam Ramrakhya, Andrew Szot, Omar Attia, Bogdan Mazoure et al.ICLR 2026 · 15 citations
- Offline Training of Language Model Agents with Functions as Learnable WeightsShaokun Zhang, Jieyu Zhang, Jiale Liu, Linxin Song et al.ICML 2024 · 41 citations
- ML-Agent: Reinforcing LLM Agents for Autonomous Machine Learning EngineeringZexi Liu, Jingyi Chai, Xinyu Zhu, shuo tang et al.ICML 2026
