USENIX Security2026Top-tier venue
Network-Level Prompt and Trait Leakage in Local Research Agents
Hyejun Jeong, Mohammadreza Teymoorianfard, Abhinav Kumar, Amir Houmansadr, Eugene Bagdasarian
Abstract
We show that Web and Research Agents (WRAs)—language-model-based systems that investigate complex topics on the Internet—are vulnerable to inference attacks by passive network observers. Deployment of WRAs locally by organizations and individuals for privacy, legal, or financial purposes exposes them to DNS resolvers, malicious ISPs, VPNs, web proxies, and corporate or government firewalls. However, unlike sporadic and scarce web browsing by humans, WRAs visit 70-140 domains per each request with a distinct timing pattern creating unique privacy risks. Specifically, we demonstrate a novel prompt and user trait leakage attack against WRAs that only leverages their network-level metadata (i.e., visited IP addresses and their timings). We start by building a new dataset of WRA traces based on real user search queries and queries generated by synthetic personas. We define a behavioral metric (called OBELS) to comprehensively assess similarity between original and inferred prompts, showing that our attack recovers over 73% of the functional and domain knowledge of user prompts. Extending to a multi-session setting, we recover up to 19 of 32 latent traits with high accuracy. Our attack remains effective under partial observability and noisy conditions. Finally, we discuss mitigation strategies that constrain domain diversity or obfuscate traces, showing negligible utility impact while reducing attack effectiveness by an average of 29%.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on22
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- Retrieval Augmented Language Model Pre-TrainingKelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Zora Tung, Panupong Pasupat et al.ICML 2020 · 2,937 citations
- Extracting Training Data from Large Language ModelsNicholas Carlini, Florian Tramèr, Eric Wallace, Matthew Jagielski et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 2,866 citations
Related papers
- Unveiling Privacy Risks in LLM Agent MemoryBo Wang, Weiyi He, Shenglai Zeng, Zhen Xiang et al.ACL 2025
- Private Investigator: Extracting Personally Identifiable Information from Large Language Models Using Optimized PromptsSeongho Keum, Dongwon Shin, Leo Marchyok, Sanghyun Hong et al.USENIX Security 2025
- MASLeak: Investigating and Exposing Intellectual Property Leakage Vulnerabilities in Multi-Agent SystemsLiwen Wang, Wenxuan Wang, Shuai Wang, Zongjie Li et al.USENIX Security 2026
- It's a TRAP! Task-Redirecting Agent Persuasion Benchmark for Web AgentsKarolina Korgul, Yushi Yang, Arkadiusz Drohomirecki, Piotr Blaszczyk et al.ICML 2026 · 8 citations
- PRSA: Prompt Stealing Attacks against Real-World Prompt ServicesYong Yang, Changjiang Li, Qingming Li, Oubo Ma et al.USENIX Security 2025
