Learning Structured Reasoning via Tractable Trajectory Control
Po-Nien Kung, Zhen Yang, Jeffrey Luo, Cheng-Fu Yang, Haikang Deng, Zi-Yi Dou, Yinfei Yang, Nanyun Peng, Zhe Gan, Kai-Wei Chang
Abstract
Large language models can exhibit emergent reasoning behaviors, often manifested as recurring lexical patterns (e.g., “wait,” indicating verification). However, complex reasoning trajectories remain sparse in unconstrained sampling, and standard RL often fails to guarantee the acquisition of diverse reasoning behaviors. We propose a systematic discovery and reinforcement of diverse reasoning patterns through structured reasoning, a paradigm that requires targeted exploration of specific reasoning patterns during the RL process. To this end, we propose Ctrl-R, a framework for learning structured reasoning via tractable trajectory control that actively guides the rollout process, incentivizing the exploration of diverse reasoning patterns that are critical for complex problem-solving. The resulting behavior policy enables accurate importance-sampling estimation, supporting unbiased on-policy optimization. We further introduce a power-scaling factor on the importance-sampling weights, allowing the policy to selectively learn from exploratory, out-of-distribution trajectories while maintaining stable optimization. Experiments demonstrate that Ctrl-R enables effective exploration and internalization of previously unattainable reasoning patterns, yielding consistent improvements across language and vision–language models on mathematical reasoning tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ee67c91f-85c0-4aed-8a42-695d298d7a7eBuilds on16
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at ScaleQiying Yu, Zheng Zhang, Ruofei Zhu, Yufeng Yuan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2,828 citations
- Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language ModelsAitor Lewkowycz, Anders Andreassen, David Dohan, Ethan Dyer et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,039 citations
- Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentionWoosuk Kwon, Zhuohan Li, Siyuan Zhuang, Ying Sheng et al.SOSP 2023 · 1,016 citations
- Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM ReasoningShenzhi Wang, Le Yu, Chang Gao, Chujie Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 592 citations
Related papers
- Experience Augmented Policy Optimization for LLM ReasoningJinda Lu, Kexin Huang, Junkang Wu, Shuo Yang et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Lookahead Tree-Based Rollouts for Enhanced Trajectory-Level Exploration in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable RewardsShangyu Xing, Siyuan Wang, Chenyuan Yang, Xin-Yu Dai et al.ICLR 2026 · 14 citations
- FlowRL: Matching Reward Distributions for LLM ReasoningXuekai Zhu, Daixuan Cheng, Dinghuai Zhang, Hengli Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 41 citations
- ExGRPO: Learning to Reason from ExperienceRunzhe Zhan, Yafu Li, Zhi Wang, Xiaoye Qu et al.ICLR 2026 · 51 citations
- Random Policy Valuation is Enough for LLM Reasoning with Verifiable RewardsHaoran He, Yuxiao Ye, Qingpeng Cai, Chen Hu et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
