Learning to Construct Better Mutation Faults

Mutation faults are the core of mutation testing and have been widely used in many other software testing and debugging tasks. Hence, constructing high-quality mutation faults is critical. There are many traditional mutation techniques that construct syntactic mutation faults based on a limited set of manually-defined mutation operators. To improve them, the state-of-the-art deep-learning (DL) based technique (i.e., DeepMutation) has been proposed to construct mutation faults by learning from real faults via classic sequence-to-sequence neural machine translation (NMT). However, its performance is not satisfactory since it cannot ensure syntactic correctness of constructed mutation faults and suffers from the effectiveness issue due to the huge search space and limited features by simply treating each targeted method as a token stream. In this work, we propose a novel DL-based mutation technique (i.e., LEAM) to overcome the limitations of both traditional techniques and DeepMutation. LEAM adapts the syntax-guided encoderdecoder architecture by extending a set of grammar rules specific to our mutation task, to guarantee syntactic correctness of constructed mutation faults. Instead of predicting a sequence of tokens one by one to form a whole mutated method, it predicts the statements to be mutated under the context of the targeted method to reduce search space, and then predicts grammar rules for mutation fault construction based on both semantic and structural features in AST. We conducted an extensive study to evaluate LEAM based on the widely-used Defects4J benchmark. The results demonstrate that the mutation faults constructed by LEAM can not only better represent real faults than two state-of-the-art traditional techniques (i.e., Major and PIT) and DeepMutation, but also substantially boost two important downstream applications of mutation faults, i.e., test case prioritization and fault localization.