Informed Initialization for Bayesian Optimization and Active Learning
Carl Hvarfner, David Eriksson, Eytan Bakshy, Maximilian Balandat
Abstract
Bayesian Optimization is a widely used method for optimizing expensive black-box functions, relying on probabilistic surrogate models such as Gaussian Processes. The quality of the surrogate model is crucial for good optimization performance, especially in the few-shot setting where only a small number of batches of points can be evaluated. In this setting, the initialization plays a critical role in shaping the surrogate's predictive quality and guiding subsequent optimization. Despite this, practitioners typically rely on (quasi-)random designs to cover the input space. However, such approaches neglect two key factors: (a) space-filling designs may not be desirable to reduce predictive uncertainty, and (b) efficient hyperparameter learning during initialization is essential for high-quality prediction, which may conflict with space-filling designs. To address these limitations, we propose Hyperparameter-Informed Predictive Exploration (HIPE), a novel acquisition strategy that balances predictive uncertainty reduction with hyperparameter learning using information-theoretic principles. We derive a closed-form expression for HIPE in the Gaussian Process setting and demonstrate its effectiveness through extensive experiments in active learning and few-shot BO. Our results show that HIPE outperforms standard initialization strategies in terms of predictive accuracy, hyperparameter identification, and subsequent optimization performance, particularly in large-batch, few-shot settings relevant to many real-world Bayesian Optimization applications.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ee0ec7aa-e613-4205-8c82-8f70e14736b6Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on13
- BoTorch: A Framework for Efficient Monte-Carlo Bayesian OptimizationMaximilian Balandat, Brian Karrer, Daniel R. Jiang, Samuel Daulton et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 686 citations
- Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian OptimizationSebastian Ament, Samuel Daulton, David Eriksson, Maximilian Balandat et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 280 citations
- Efficiently sampling functions from Gaussian process posteriorsJames T. Wilson, Viacheslav Borovitskiy, Alexander Terenin, Peter Mostowsky et al.ICML 2020 · 186 citations
- Accelerating Bayesian Optimization for Biological Sequence Design with Denoising AutoencodersSamuel Stanton, Wesley J. Maddox, Nate Gruver, Phillip M. Maffettone et al.ICML 2022 · 137 citations
- Local Latent Space Bayesian Optimization over Structured InputsNatalie Maus, Haydn Thomas Jones, Juston Moore, Matt J. Kusner et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 118 citations
Related papers
- Few-Shot Bayesian Optimization with Deep Kernel SurrogatesMartin Wistuba, Josif GrabockaICLR 2021 · 87 citations
- FSEO: Few-Shot Evolutionary Optimization via Meta-Learning for Expensive Multi-Objective OptimizationXunzhao YuNeurIPS 2025
- Batched Energy-Entropy acquisition for Bayesian OptimizationFelix Teufel, Carsten Stahlhut, Jesper Ferkinghoff-BorgNeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations
- Objective Bound Conditional Gaussian Process for Bayesian OptimizationTaewon Jeong, Heeyoung KimICML 2021 · 3 citations
- Incorporating Expert Priors into Bayesian Optimization via Dynamic Mean DecayChongqi Qu, Meiqin Liu, Jian Lan, Shanling Dong et al.ICLR 2026
