MPMA: Preference Manipulation Attack Against Model Context Protocol
Zihan Wang, Rui Zhang, Yu Liu, Wenshu Fan, Wenbo Jiang, Qingchuan Zhao, Hongwei Li, Guowen Xu
Abstract
Model Context Protocol (MCP) standardizes interface mapping for large language models (LLMs) to access external data and tools, which revolutionizes the paradigm of tool selection and facilitates the rapid expansion of the LLM agent tool ecosystem. However, as the MCP is increasingly adopted, third-party customized versions of the MCP server expose potential security vulnerabilities. In this paper, we first introduce a novel security threat, which we term the MCP Preference Manipulation Attack (MPMA). An attacker deploys a customized MCP server to manipulate LLMs, causing them to prioritize it over other competing MCP servers. This can result in economic benefits for attackers, such as revenue from paid MCP services or advertising income generated from free servers. To achieve MPMA, we first design a Direct Preference Manipulation Attack (DPMA) that achieves significant effectiveness by inserting the manipulative words and phrases into the tool name and description. However, such a direct modification is obvious to users and lacks stealthiness. To address these limitations, we further propose Genetic-based Advertising Preference Manipulation Attack (GAPMA). GAPMA employs four commonly used strategies to initialize descriptions and integrates a Genetic Algorithm (GA) to enhance stealthiness. The experimental results demonstrate that GAPMA balances high effectiveness and stealthiness. Our study reveals a critical vulnerability of the MCP in open ecosystems, highlighting an urgent need for robust defense mechanisms to ensure the fairness of the MCP ecosystem. Our code is available at https://github.com/hanbaoergogo/MPMA 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ee080893-cb56-43f6-8e46-5e00dd04fb58Cited by top-tier papers3
- MCP Security Bench (MSB): Benchmarking Attacks Against Model Context Protocol in LLM AgentsDongsen Zhang, Zekun Li, Xu Luo, Xuannan Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 47 citations
- Parasites in the Toolchain: A Large-Scale Analysis of Attacks on the MCP EcosystemShuli Zhao, Qinsheng Hou, Zihan Zhan, Yanhao Wang et al.S&P 2026 · 20 citations
- ContractGuard: Auditing Semantic Contracts of MCP Tools for Security ViolationsHengkai Ye, Zhechang Zhang, Ruibo Lu, Jinyuan Jia et al.CCS 2026
Builds on5
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- A Survey on In-context LearningQingxiu Dong, Lei Li, Damai Dai, Ce Zheng et al.EMNLP 2024 · 479 citations
- Prompt Injection Attack to Tool Selection in LLM AgentsJiawen Shi, Zenghui Yuan, Guiyao Tie, Pan Zhou et al.NDSS 2026 · 181 citations
- Instruction Backdoor Attacks Against Customized LLMsRui Zhang, Hongwei Li, Rui Wen, Wenbo Jiang et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 83 citations
Related papers
- Attractive Metadata Attack: Inducing LLM Agents to Invoke Malicious ToolsKanghua Mo, Li Hu, Yucheng Long, Zhihao LiNeurIPS 2025 · 37 citations
- Tool Preferences in Agentic LLMs are UnreliableKazem Faghih, Wenxiao Wang, Yize Cheng, Siddhant Bharti et al.EMNLP 2025
- AgentBound: Securing Execution Boundaries of AI AgentsChristoph Bühler, Matteo Biagiola, Luca Di Grazia, Guido SalvaneschiFSE 2026 · 1 citation
- MCPTox: A Benchmark for Tool Poisoning on Real-World MCP ServersZhiqiang Wang, Yichao Gao, Yanting Wang, Suyuan Liu et al.AAAI 2026 · 6 citations
- Adversarial Search Engine Optimization for Large Language ModelsFredrik Nestaas, Edoardo Debenedetti, Florian TramèrICLR 2025
