Language Acquisition Device in Large Language Models
Masato Mita, Taiga Someya, Ryo Yoshida, Yohei Oseki
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) remain substantially less data-efficient than humans. Pre-pretraining (PPT) on synthetic languages has been proposed to close this gap, with prior work emphasizing highly expressive formal languages such as -Shuffle Dyck. Inspired by the Language Acquisition Device (LAD) hypothesis, which posits that innate constraints preemptively restrict the learner's hypothesis space to natural-language-like structure, we propose LAD-inspired PPT: pre-pretraining on MP-STRUCT, a formal language whose strings encode hierarchical composition, feature-based dependencies, and long-distance displacement via MERGE, AGREE, and MOVE. A brief 500-step PPT with MP-STRUCT matches strong formal-language baselines in token efficiency while additionally imparting a human-like resistance to structurally implausible languages (e.g., REVERSE). Analyzing simplified variants, we find that MP-STRUCT CORE outperforms -Shuffle Dyck despite not being definable in C-RASP (a formal bound on transformer expressivity), challenging the prior hypothesis that effective PPT languages must be both hierarchically expressive and circuit-theoretically learnable. We show that functional landmarks, which reduce dependency resolution ambiguity, are a key driver, suggesting that effective PPT design depends not only on expressivity but also on the accessibility of dependency resolution.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext edd926f0-b768-4c57-9010-204d18b44241Builds on7
- Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on CompositionalityNouha Dziri, Ximing Lu, Melanie Sclar, Xiang Lorraine Li et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 728 citations
- Are Transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions?Chulhee Yun, Srinadh Bhojanapalli, Ankit Singh Rawat, Sashank J. Reddi et al.ICLR 2020 · 481 citations
- The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"Lukas Berglund, Meg Tong, Maximilian Kaufmann, Mikita Balesni et al.ICLR 2024 · 462 citations
- Learning Music Helps You Read: Using Transfer to Study Linguistic Structure in Language ModelsIsabel Papadimitriou, Dan JurafskyEMNLP 2020 · 40 citations
- Pretraining with Artificial Language: Studying Transferable Knowledge in Language ModelsRyokan Ri, Yoshimasa TsuruokaACL 2022 · 40 citations
Related papers
- Between Circuits and Chomsky: Pre-pretraining on Formal Languages Imparts Linguistic BiasesMichael Y. Hu, Jackson Petty, Chuan Shi, William Merrill et al.ACL 2025
- Procedural Pretraining: Warming Up Language Models with Abstract DataLiangze Jiang, Zachary Shinnick, Anton Hengel, Hemanth Saratchandran et al.ICML 2026 · 6 citations
- How to Plant Trees in Language Models: Data and Architectural Effects on the Emergence of Syntactic Inductive BiasesAaron Mueller, Tal LinzenACL 2023 · 9 citations
- Structural Guidance for Transformer Language ModelsPeng Qian, Tahira Naseem, Roger Levy, Ramón Fernandez AstudilloACL 2021
- Rethinking Visual Intelligence: Insights from Video PretrainingPablo Acuaviva, Aram Davtyan, Mariam Hassan, Sebastian Stapf et al.ICML 2026 · 4 citations
