Spectrum: Speedy and Strictly-Deterministic Smart Contract Transactions for Blockchain Ledgers
Zhihao Chen, Tianji Yang, Yixiao Zheng, Zhao Zhang, Cheqing Jin, Aoying Zhou
Abstract
Today, blockchain ledgers utilize concurrent deterministic execution schemes to scale up. However, ordering fairness is not preserved in these schemes: although they ensure all replicas achieve the same serial order, this order does not always align with the fair, consensus-established order when executing smart contracts with runtime-determined accesses. To preserve ordering fairness, an intuitive method is to concurrently execute transactions and re-execute any order-violating ones. This in turn increases unforeseen conflicts, leading to scaling bottlenecks caused by numerous costly aborts under contention. To address these issues, we propose Spectrum, a novel deterministic execution scheme for smart contract execution on blockchain ledgers. Spectrum preserves the consensus-established serial order (so-called strict determinism) with high performance. Specifically, we leverage a speculative deterministic concurrency control to execute transactions in speculation and enforce an agreed-upon serial order by aborting and re-executing any mis-speculated ones. To overcome the scaling bottleneck, we present two key optimizations based on speculative processing: operation-level rollback and predictive scheduling, for reducing both the overhead and the number of mis-speculations. We evaluate Spectrum by executing EVM-based smart contracts on popular benchmarks, showing that it realizes fair smart contract execution by preserving ordering fairness and outperforms competitive schemes in contended workloads by 1.4x to 4.1x.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ed85fd6f-1cd0-4bcc-bd4f-09146aea9cabCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on18
- Flash Boys 2.0: Frontrunning in Decentralized Exchanges, Miner Extractable Value, and Consensus InstabilityPhilip Daian, Steven Goldfeder, Tyler Kell, Yunqi Li et al.S&P 2020 · 607 citations
- A Decentralized Blockchain with High Throughput and Fast ConfirmationChenxing Li, Peilun Li, Dong Zhou, Zhe Yang et al.USENIX ATC 2020 · 172 citations
- Order-Fairness for Byzantine ConsensusMahimna Kelkar, Fan Zhang, Steven Goldfeder, Ari JuelsCRYPTO 2020 · 152 citations
- Byzantine Ordered Consensus without Byzantine OligarchyYunhao Zhang, Srinath T. V. Setty, Qi Chen, Lidong Zhou et al.OSDI 2020 · 131 citations
- A Transactional Perspective on Execute-order-validate BlockchainsPingcheng Ruan, Dumitrel Loghin, Quang-Trung Ta, Meihui Zhang et al.SIGMOD 2020 · 117 citations
Related papers
- Toward High-Performance Blockchain System by Blurring the Line between Ordering and ExecutionDonghyeon Ryu, Chanik ParkSC 2024 · 6 citations
- Vegeta: Enabling Parallel Smart Contract Execution in Leaderless BlockchainsTianjing Xu, Yongqi Zhong, Yiming Zhang, Ruofan Xiong et al.NSDI 2025 · 9 citations
- Utilizing Parallelism in Smart Contracts on Decentralized Blockchains by Taming Application-Inherent ConflictsPéter Garamvölgyi, Yuxi Liu, Dong Zhou, Fan Long et al.ICSE 2022 · 31 citations
- Loom: A Deterministic Execution Framework Towards Nested Contract TransactionsHuan Zhang, Xiaodong Qi, Haibo Tang, Zhao Zhang et al.ICDE 2025 · 3 citations
- Block-STM: Scaling Blockchain Execution by Turning Ordering Curse to a Performance BlessingRati Gelashvili, Alexander Spiegelman, Zhuolun Xiang, George Danezis et al.PPoPP 2023 · 49 citations
