Surface Form Competition: Why the Highest Probability Answer Isn't Always Right
Ari Holtzman, Peter West, Vered Shwartz, Yejin Choi, Luke Zettlemoyer
Abstract
Large language models have shown promising results in zero-shot settings (Brown et al., 2020; Radford et al., 2019) . For example, they can perform multiple choice tasks simply by conditioning on a question and selecting the answer with the highest probability. However, ranking by string probability can be problematic due to surface form competition-wherein different surface forms compete for probability mass, even if they represent the same underlying concept in a given context, e.g. "computer" and "PC." Since probability mass is finite, this lowers the probability of the correct answer, due to competition from other strings that are valid answers (but not one of the multiple choice options). We introduce Domain Conditional Pointwise Mutual Information, an alternative scoring function that directly compensates for surface form competition by simply reweighing each option according to its a priori likelihood within the context of a specific task. It achieves consistent gains in zero-shot performance over both calibrated (Zhao et al., 2021) and uncalibrated scoring functions on all GPT-2 and GPT-3 models on a variety of multiple choice datasets. *
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ecbc8eae-88a2-4e20-ba45-c7193ccb8157Cited by top-tier papers76
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free RewardYu Meng, Mengzhou Xia, Danqi ChenNeurIPS 2024 · 1,203 citations
- An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian InferenceSang Michael Xie, Aditi Raghunathan, Percy Liang, Tengyu MaICLR 2022 · 1,030 citations
- Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?Sewon Min, Xinxi Lyu, Ari Holtzman, Mikel Artetxe et al.EMNLP 2022 · 634 citations
- In-context Vectors: Making In Context Learning More Effective and Controllable Through Latent Space SteeringSheng Liu, Haotian Ye, Lei Xing, James Y. ZouICML 2024 · 244 citations
Builds on11
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-shot Performance of Language ModelsZihao Zhao, Eric Wallace, Shi Feng, Dan Klein et al.ICML 2021 · 1,843 citations
- Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order SensitivityYao Lu, Max Bartolo, Alastair Moore, Sebastian Riedel et al.ACL 2022 · 1,494 citations
Related papers
- A Setwise Approach for Effective and Highly Efficient Zero-shot Ranking with Large Language ModelsShengyao Zhuang, Honglei Zhuang, Bevan Koopman, Guido ZucconSIGIR 2024 · 60 citations
- Increasing Probability Mass on Answer Choices Does Not Always Improve AccuracySarah Wiegreffe, Matthew Finlayson, Oyvind Tafjord, Peter Clark et al.EMNLP 2023 · 1 citation
- Precise Zero-Shot Pointwise Ranking with LLMs through Post-Aggregated Global Context InformationKehan Long, Shasha Li, Chen Xu, Jintao Tang et al.SIGIR 2025
- Revisiting the Role of Language Priors in Vision-Language ModelsZhiqiu Lin, Xinyue Chen, Deepak Pathak, Pengchuan Zhang et al.ICML 2024 · 44 citations
- CARPRT: Class-Aware Zero-Shot Prompt Reweighting for Vision-Language ModelRuijiang Dong, Zesheng Ye, Jianzhong Qi, Lei Feng et al.ICLR 2026
