MA-CIR: A Multimodal Arithmetic Benchmark for Composed Image Retrieval
Jaeseok Byun, Young Kyun Jang, Seokhyeon Jeong, Donghyun Kim, Taesup Moon
Abstract
Composed Image Retrieval (CIR) seeks to retrieve a target image by using a reference image and conditioning text specifying desired modifications. While recent approaches have shown steady performance improvements on existing CIR benchmarks, we argue that it remains unclear whether these gains genuinely reflect an enhanced compositional understanding of both visual and textual information. For example, current benchmarks do not explicitly consider negation cases and offer limited semantic diversity, with insufficient hard negatives to thoroughly evaluate the CIR task. To bridge this gap, we introduce Multimodal Arithmetic Benchmark for CIR (MA-CIR), a challenging CIR benchmark that integrates arithmetic types (negation, replacement, and addition) across seven complex semantic categories (e.g., spatial reasoning, object reasoning, etc). Moreover, carefully constructed hard negatives are incorporated to assess models in a controlled setting. In MA-CIR, we observe that current CIR models struggle with negation (or replacement) arithmetic types and semantic types that require complex reasoning, indicating a potential reliance on object or concept information. To tackle this, we propose leveraging strong text encoders, particularly those based on large language models (LLMs), and fine-tuning them using carefully constructed text triplets that include hard negatives, thereby enhancing their compositional understanding. As a result, MA-CIR achieves a 16% gain on MA-CIR, along with 6% and 9% improvements on CIRR and CIRCO, respectively. Our code and dataset are available in https://github.com/jaeseokbyun/MACIR.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext eca2a5be-490c-4c3b-8a18-9204cbd37ab1Builds on39
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language ModelsJunnan Li, Dongxu Li, Silvio Savarese, Steven C. H. HoiICML 2023 · 7,873 citations
- BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and GenerationJunnan Li, Dongxu Li, Caiming Xiong, Steven C. H. HoiICML 2022 · 6,549 citations
Related papers
- CoLLM: A Large Language Model for Composed Image RetrievalChuong Huynh, Jinyu Yang, Ashish Tawari, Mubarak Shah et al.CVPR 2025
- MCoT-MVS: Multi-level Vision Selection by Multi-modal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Composed Image RetrievalXuri Ge, Chunhao Wang, Xindi Wang, Zheyun Qin et al.WWW 2026
- ConText-CIR: Learning from Concepts in Text for Composed Image RetrievalEric Xing, Pranavi Kolouju, Robert Pless, Abby Stylianou et al.CVPR 2025
- Improving Composed Image Retrieval via Contrastive Learning with Scaling Positives and NegativesZhangchi Feng, Richong Zhang, Zhijie NieACM MM 2024 · 14 citations
- Rethinking Composed Image Retrieval Evaluation: A Fine-Grained Benchmark from Image EditingTingyu Song, Yanzhao Zhang, Mingxin Li, Zhuoning Guo et al.ACL 2026
