Scaling Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning with Batch and Weight Normalization
Daniel Palenicek, Florian Vogt, Joe Watson, Jan Peters
Abstract
Reinforcement learning has achieved significant milestones, but sample efficiency remains a bottleneck for real-world applications. Recently, CrossQ has demonstrated state-of-the-art sample efficiency with a low update-to-data (UTD) ratio of 1. In this work, we explore CrossQ's scaling behavior with higher UTD ratios. We identify challenges in the training dynamics, which are emphasized by higher UTD ratios. To address these, we integrate weight normalization into the CrossQ framework, a solution that stabilizes training, has been shown to prevent potential loss of plasticity and keeps the effective learning rate constant. Our proposed approach reliably scales with increasing UTD ratios, achieving competitive performance across 25 challenging continuous control tasks on the DeepMind Control Suite and MyoSuite benchmarks, notably the complex dog and humanoid environments. This work eliminates the need for drastic interventions, such as network resets, and offers a simple yet robust pathway for improving sample efficiency and scalability in model-free reinforcement learning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ec604d80-5860-450a-8fcf-ae6511c958c5Cited by top-tier papers4
- XQC: Well-conditioned Optimization Accelerates Deep Reinforcement LearningDaniel Palenicek, Florian Vogt, Joe Watson, Ingmar Posner et al.ICLR 2026 · 20 citations
- Bridging the performance-gap between target-free and target-based reinforcement learningThéo Vincent, Yogesh Tripathi, Tim Lukas Faust, Abdullah Akgül et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- Use the Online Network If You Can: Towards Fast and Stable Reinforcement LearningAhmed Hendawy, Henrik Metternich, Théo Vincent, Mahdi Kallel et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Debiased Model-based Representations for Sample-efficient Continuous ControlJiafei Lyu, Zichuan Lin, Scott Fujimoto, Kai Yang et al.ICML 2026
Builds on15
- Sharpness-aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving GeneralizationPierre Foret, Ariel Kleiner, Hossein Mobahi, Behnam NeyshaburICLR 2021 · 1,861 citations
- Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent ImaginationDanijar Hafner, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Jimmy Ba, Mohammad NorouziICLR 2020 · 1,852 citations
- Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical PrecipiceRishabh Agarwal, Max Schwarzer, Pablo Samuel Castro, Aaron C. Courville et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,067 citations
- TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous ControlNicklas Hansen, Hao Su, Xiaolong WangICLR 2024 · 388 citations
- On Warm-Starting Neural Network TrainingJordan T. Ash, Ryan P. AdamsNeurIPS 2020 · 288 citations
Related papers
- CrossQ: Batch Normalization in Deep Reinforcement Learning for Greater Sample Efficiency and SimplicityAditya Bhatt, Daniel Palenicek, Boris Belousov, Max Argus et al.ICLR 2024 · 106 citations
- Bigger, Regularized, Optimistic: scaling for compute and sample efficient continuous controlMichal Nauman, Mateusz Ostaszewski, Krzysztof Jankowski, Piotr Milos et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 119 citations
- MAD-TD: Model-Augmented Data stabilizes High Update Ratio RLClaas Voelcker, Marcel Hussing, Eric Eaton, Amir-massoud Farahmand et al.ICLR 2025
- Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning by Breaking the Replay Ratio BarrierPierluca D'Oro, Max Schwarzer, Evgenii Nikishin, Pierre-Luc Bacon et al.ICLR 2023
- Simplified Temporal Consistency Reinforcement LearningYi Zhao, Wenshuai Zhao, Rinu Boney, Juho Kannala et al.ICML 2023 · 19 citations
