Biologically Plausible Brain Graph Transformer
Ciyuan Peng, Yuelong Huang, Qichao Dong, Shuo Yu, Feng Xia, Chengqi Zhang, Yaochu Jin
Abstract
State-of-the-art brain graph analysis methods fail to fully encode the small-world architecture of brain graphs (accompanied by the presence of hubs and functional modules), and therefore lack biological plausibility to some extent. This limitation hinders their ability to accurately represent the brain's structural and functional properties, thereby restricting the effectiveness of machine learning models in tasks such as brain disorder detection. In this work, we propose a novel Biologically Plausible Brain Graph Transformer (BioBGT) that encodes the small-world architecture inherent in brain graphs. Specifically, we present a network entanglement-based node importance encoding technique that captures the structural importance of nodes in global information propagation during brain graph communication, highlighting the biological properties of the brain structure. Furthermore, we introduce a functional module-aware self-attention to preserve the functional segregation and integration characteristics of brain graphs in the learned representations. Experimental results on three benchmark datasets demonstrate that BioBGT outperforms state-of-the-art models, enhancing biologically plausible brain graph representations for various brain graph analytical tasks 1 .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ebaab96e-3afa-453d-bc92-0a6bb5e20174Cited by top-tier papers8
- Do We Really Need Message Passing in Brain Network Modeling?Liang Yang, Yuwei Liu, Jiaming Zhuo, Di Jin et al.ICML 2025
- On the Spectral Unreachability of Brain Graph LearningJiaming Zhuo, Shuai Zhai, Ziyi Ma, Kun Fu et al.ICML 2026
- Temporal Geometry of Deep Networks: Hyperbolic Representations of Training Dynamics for Intrinsic ExplainabilityAmbarish MoharilICLR 2026
- Structured Multi-modal Graph Disentanglement for Psychiatric DiagnosisHongyu Shi, Kaizhong Zheng, WS Zhai, Shuai Jiang et al.ICML 2026
- BrainHGT: A Hierarchical Graph Transformer for Interpretable Brain Network AnalysisJiajun Ma, Yongchao Zhang, Chao Zhang, Zhao Lv et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on17
- Do Transformers Really Perform Badly for Graph Representation?Chengxuan Ying, Tianle Cai, Shengjie Luo, Shuxin Zheng et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,632 citations
- DropEdge: Towards Deep Graph Convolutional Networks on Node ClassificationYu Rong, Wenbing Huang, Tingyang Xu, Junzhou HuangICLR 2020 · 1,599 citations
- Rethinking Graph Transformers with Spectral AttentionDevin Kreuzer, Dominique Beaini, William L. Hamilton, Vincent Létourneau et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 854 citations
- Graph Neural Networks with Learnable Structural and Positional RepresentationsVijay Prakash Dwivedi, Anh Tuan Luu, Thomas Laurent, Yoshua Bengio et al.ICLR 2022 · 464 citations
- Structure-Aware Transformer for Graph Representation LearningDexiong Chen, Leslie O'Bray, Karsten M. BorgwardtICML 2022 · 349 citations
Related papers
- Long-range Brain Graph TransformerShuo Yu, Shan Jin, Ming Li, Tabinda Sarwar et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 32 citations
- Make Model Transparent: Brain Network Analysis via Causal and Knowledge Graph LearningLingyuan Meng, Ke Liang, Hao Yu, Haotian Wang et al.AAAI 2026
- Local-Global Coupling Spiking Graph Transformer for Brain Disorders Diagnosis from Two PerspectivesGeng Zhang, Jiangrong Shen, Kaizhong Zheng, Liangjun Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- NeuroPath: A Neural Pathway Transformer for Joining the Dots of Human ConnectomesZiquan Wei, Tingting Dan, Jiaqi Ding, Guorong WuNeurIPS 2024 · 12 citations
- Brain Network TransformerXuan Kan, Wei Dai, Hejie Cui, Zilong Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 272 citations
