Optimized Tokenization for Transcribed Error Correction
Tomer Wullach, Shlomo E. Chazan
Abstract
The challenges facing speech recognition systems, such as variations in pronunciations, adverse audio conditions, and the scarcity of labeled data, emphasize the necessity for a post-processing step that corrects recurring errors. Previous research has shown the advantages of employing dedicated error correction models, yet training such models requires large amounts of labeled data which is not easily obtained. To overcome this limitation, synthetic transcribed-like data is often utilized, however, bridging the distribution gap between transcribed errors and synthetic noise is not trivial. In this paper, we demonstrate that the performance of correction models can be significantly increased by training solely using synthetic data. Specifically, we empirically show that: (1) synthetic data generated using the error distribution derived from a set of transcribed data outperforms the common approach of applying random perturbations; (2) applying language-specific adjustments to the vocabulary of a BPE tokenizer strike a balance between adapting to unseen distributions and retaining knowledge of transcribed errors. We showcase the benefits of these key observations, and evaluate our approach using multiple languages, speech recognition systems and prominent speech recognition datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext eb86390b-9072-42cc-9a52-39417b1fd727Builds on8
- wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech RepresentationsAlexei Baevski, Yuhao Zhou, Abdelrahman Mohamed, Michael AuliNeurIPS 2020 · 9,451 citations
- Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Tao Xu, Greg Brockman et al.ICML 2023 · 6,966 citations
- FastCorrect: Fast Error Correction with Edit Alignment for Automatic Speech RecognitionYichong Leng, Xu Tan, Linchen Zhu, Jin Xu et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 84 citations
- Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Language Models to Input PerturbationsMilad Moradi, Matthias SamwaldEMNLP 2021 · 64 citations
- SoftCorrect: Error Correction with Soft Detection for Automatic Speech RecognitionYichong Leng, Xu Tan, Wenjie Liu, Kaitao Song et al.AAAI 2023 · 22 citations
Related papers
- Task Arithmetic can Mitigate Synthetic-to-Real Gap in Automatic Speech RecognitionHsuan Su, Hua Farn, Fan-Yun Sun, Shang-Tse Chen et al.EMNLP 2024 · 6 citations
- From Tens of Hours to Tens of Thousands: Scaling Back-Translation for Speech RecognitionTianduo Wang, Lu Xu, Wei Lu, Shanbo ChengEMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Not All LLM-Generated Data Are Equal: Rethinking Data Weighting in Text ClassificationHsun-Yu Kuo, Yin-Hsiang Liao, Yu-Chieh Chao, Wei-Yun Ma et al.ICLR 2025
- Back Transcription as a Method for Evaluating Robustness of Natural Language Understanding Models to Speech Recognition ErrorsMarek Kubis, Pawel Skórzewski, Marcin Sowanski, Tomasz ZietkiewiczEMNLP 2023 · 7 citations
- Scaling Properties of Speech Language ModelsSantiago Cuervo, Ricard MarxerEMNLP 2024 · 5 citations
