CARMA: Enhanced Compositionality in LLMs via Advanced Regularisation and Mutual Information Alignment
Nura Aljaafari, Danilo S. Carvalho, André Freitas
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) struggle with compositional generalisation, limiting their ability to systematically combine learned components to interpret novel inputs. While architectural modifications, fine-tuning, and data augmentation improve compositionality, they often have limited adaptability, face scalability constraints, or yield diminishing returns on real data. To address this, we propose CARMA, an intervention that enhances the stability and robustness of compositional reasoning in LLMs while preserving fine-tuned performance. CARMA employs mutual information regularisation and layer-wise stability constraints to mitigate feature fragmentation, ensuring structured representations persist across and within layers. We evaluate CARMA on inverse dictionary modelling and sentiment classification, measuring its impact on semantic consistency, performance stability, and robustness to lexical perturbations. Results show that CARMA reduces the variability introduced by fine-tuning, stabilises token representations, and improves compositional reasoning. While its effectiveness varies across architectures, CARMA's key strength lies in reinforcing learned structures rather than introducing new capabilities, making it a scalable auxiliary method. These findings suggest that integrating CARMA with fine-tuning can improve compositional generalisation while maintaining task-specific performance in LLMs. Original Model FT Model CARMA Model Constituent-Aware Pooling (CAP) Improved Compositional Generalisation (+) (+) (-) (-) (-)
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext eb6a4f4f-dc5c-4096-8e46-76570cbaa7e8Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on15
- Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on CompositionalityNouha Dziri, Ximing Lu, Melanie Sclar, Xiang Lorraine Li et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 728 citations
- Stabilizing Transformer Training by Preventing Attention Entropy CollapseShuangfei Zhai, Tatiana Likhomanenko, Etai Littwin, Dan Busbridge et al.ICML 2023 · 153 citations
- COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic InterpretationNajoung Kim, Tal LinzenEMNLP 2020 · 149 citations
- Making Transformers Solve Compositional TasksSantiago Ontañón, Joshua Ainslie, Zachary Fisher, Vaclav CvicekACL 2022 · 87 citations
- Isotropy in the Contextual Embedding Space: Clusters and ManifoldsXingyu Cai, Jiaji Huang, Yuchen Bian, Kenneth ChurchICLR 2021 · 50 citations
Related papers
- Can Large Language Models Learn Independent Causal Mechanisms?Gaël Gendron, Bao Trung Nguyen, Alex Yuxuan Peng, Michael J. Witbrock et al.EMNLP 2024 · 2 citations
- Toward Robust Multilingual Adaptation of LLMs for Low-Resource LanguagesHaolin Li, Haipeng Zhang, Mang Li, Yaohua Wang et al.ICML 2026
- LLM Augmented LLMs: Expanding Capabilities through CompositionRachit Bansal, Bidisha Samanta, Siddharth Dalmia, Nitish Gupta et al.ICLR 2024 · 51 citations
- From Reasoning Traces to Reusable Modules: Understanding Compositional Generalization in Language Model ReasoningLingjing Kong, Xin Liu, Guangyi Chen, Martin Q. Ma et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- How Abilities in Large Language Models are Affected by Supervised Fine-tuning Data CompositionGuanting Dong, Hongyi Yuan, Keming Lu, Chengpeng Li et al.ACL 2024 · 39 citations
