On Approximability of Steiner Tree in ℓp-metrics
Henry L. Fleischmann, Surya Teja Gavva, Karthik C. S.
Abstract
In the Continuous Steiner Tree problem (CST), we are given as input a set of points (called terminals) in a metric space and asked for the minimum-cost tree connecting them. Additional points (called Steiner points) from the metric space can be introduced as nodes in the solution. In the Discrete Steiner Tree problem (DST), we are given in addition to the terminals, a set of facilities, and any solution tree connecting the terminals can only contain the Steiner points from this set of facilities.
Trevisan [SICOMP'00] showed that CST and DST are APX-hard when the input lies in the ℓ 1 -metric (and Hamming metric). Chlebík and Chlebíkov á [TCS'08] showed that DST is NP-hard to approximate to factor of 96/95 ≈ 1.01 in the graph metric (and consequently ℓ ∞ -metric).
Prior to this work, it was unclear if CST and DST are APX-hard in essentially every other popular metric.
In this work, we prove that DST is APX-hard in every ℓ 𝑝 -metric. We also prove that CST is APX-hard in the ℓ ∞ -metric. Finally, we relate CST and DST, by observing a gap preserving reduction from CST to DST in ℓ 𝑝 -metrics.
It is known that the APX-hardness of DST in ℓ 0 , ℓ 1 , and ℓ ∞ -metrics can be obtained from the APX-hardness of covering problems (with additional structure). Our main conceptual insight is that for certain ranges of 𝑝 (such as 𝑝 = 2), the soundness guarantees of covering problems might be insufficient to show that DST in the ℓ 𝑝 -metric is APX-hard, but the soundness guarantees of a packing problem (with requisite additional structure) is enough. Equipped with this insight,
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext eb296ad8-c685-4c28-8c76-17ddb3e8e3c8Cited by top-tier papers2
- Fine-Grained Complexity of Continuous Euclidean k-CenterLotte Blank, Karl Bringmann, Parinya Chalermsook, Karthik C. S. et al.STOC 2026 · 2 citations
- Inapproximability of Maximum Diameter Clustering for Few ClustersHenry L. Fleischmann, Kyrylo Karlov, Karthik C. S., Ashwin Padaki et al.SODA 2025
Builds on3
- On Approximability of Clustering Problems Without Candidate CentersVincent Cohen-Addad, Karthik C. S., Euiwoong LeeSODA 2021 · 24 citations
- Johnson Coverage Hypothesis: Inapproximability of k-means and k-median in ℓp-metricsVincent Cohen-Addad, Karthik C. S., Euiwoong LeeSODA 2022 · 8 citations
- Near-linear time approximation schemes for Steiner tree and forest in low-dimensional spacesYair Bartal, Lee-Ad GottliebSTOC 2021 · 5 citations
Related papers
- Euclidean Bottleneck Steiner Tree is Fixed-Parameter TractableSayan Bandyapadhyay, William Lochet, Daniel Lokshtanov, Saket Saurabh et al.SODA 2024 · 2 citations
- Query Complexity of the Metric Steiner Tree ProblemYu Chen, Sanjeev Khanna, Zihan TanSODA 2023
- Polynomial Integrality Gap of Flow LP for Directed Steiner TreeShi Li, Bundit LaekhanukitSODA 2022 · 3 citations
- Steiner-Hardness: A Query Hardness Measure for Graph-Based ANN IndexesZeyu Wang, Qitong Wang, Xiaoxing Cheng, Peng Wang et al.VLDB 2024 · 19 citations
- A Constant Factor Approximation for Navigating Through Connected Obstacles in the PlaneNeeraj Kumar, Daniel Lokshtanov, Saket Saurabh, Subhash SuriSODA 2021 · 3 citations
