Can Treadmill Walking Replicate Natural Walking? Optimizing Speed, Platform Tilt, and Training Duration on a Cyberith Virtualizer Elite 2
Sodabe Bandali, Soumyajit Chakraborty, Andrew S. McAvan, Timothy P. McNamara, Bobby Bodenheimer
Abstract
Locomotion is central to human navigation and spatial learning, with natural walking offering the most effective movement in immersive virtual environments (IVEs) due to its rich proprioceptive and vestibular feedback. However, space constraints often limit natural walking in IVEs, prompting the use of omnidirectional treadmills. The Cyberith Virtualizer Elite 2 enables users to walk in place by sliding their feet on a low-friction, tiltable platform while secured in a harness. It allows control over both tilt angle and walking speed, offering researchers flexibility in adjusting sensorimotor cues. In this study, we examined how tilt angle, speed, and training duration affect distance perception and cybersickness. In Experiment 1, we tested three tilt angles (0°, 8.5°, 17°) and three speeds (0.8×, 1.0×, 1.2× treadmill speed) during blind walking. A slower speed (0.8×) aligned best with natural walking and minimized cybersickness; users preferred the 8.5° tilt. Additional analysis identified 0.7× speed with 8.5° tilt as preferred. In Experiment 2, we varied training durations (3, 6, or 9 minutes) and found that, with the preferred setup, treadmill distance judgments were comparable to natural walking. At least 6 minutes of training was sufficient for adaptation. These findings offer practical guidance for configuring treadmill locomotion in virtual reality research.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get eb1fa237-8fef-4264-96eb-ec6facffe4cfRelated papers
- Omnidirectional VR Treadmills Walking Techniques: Comparing Walking-in-Place and Sliding vs Natural WalkingHelia Homami, Adria Quigley, Mayra Donaji Barrera MachucaIEEE VR 2025 · 5 citations
- Understanding User Experiences Across VR Walking-in-place Locomotion MethodsChek Tien Tan, Leon Cewei Foo, Adriel Yeo, Jeannie Su Ann Lee et al.CHI 2022 · 20 citations
- Determining Perception Thresholds for Real and Virtual Inclinations While Cycling in Virtual RealityJonas Keppel, Marvin Prochazka, Stefan Lewin, Markus Stroehnisch et al.CHI 2026 · 3 citations
- Collaborative Navigation Improves Spatial Learning Across Symmetric and Asymmetric Locomotion in Virtual RealitySoumyajit Chakraborty, Holly C. Gagnon, Timothy P. McNamara, Bobby BodenheimerIEEE VR 2026
- Designing for Wayfinding in VR: Linking Navigation Interfaces to Spatial Learning and Cognitive MappingArmin Mostafavi, Zhiwen Qiu, Tong Bill Xu, Wenqian Niu et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
