Interactive Trimming Against Evasive Online Data Manipulation Attacks: A Game-Theoretic Approach
Yue Fu, Qingqing Ye, Rong Du, Haibo Hu
Abstract
With the exponential growth of data and its crucial impact on our lives and decision-making, the integrity of data has become a significant concern. Malicious data poisoning attacks, where false values are injected into the data, can disrupt machine learning processes and lead to severe consequences. To mitigate these attacks, distance-based defenses, such as trimming, have been proposed, but they can be easily evaded by white-box attackers. The evasiveness and effectiveness of poisoning attack strategies are two sides of the same coin, making game theory a promising approach. However, existing game-theoretical models often overlook the complexities of online data poisoning attacks, where strategies must adapt to the dynamic process of data collection. In this paper, we present an interactive game-theoretical model to defend online data manipulation attacks using the trimming strategy. Our model accommodates a complete strategy space, making it applicable to strong evasive and colluding adversaries. Leveraging the principle of least action and the Euler-Lagrange equation from theoretical physics, we derive an analytical model for the game-theoretic process. To demonstrate its practical usage, we present a case study in a privacy-preserving data collection system under local differential privacy where a non-deterministic utility function is adopted. Two strategies are devised from this analytical model, namely, Tit-for-tat and Elastic. We conduct extensive experiments on real-world datasets, which showcase the effectiveness and accuracy of these two strategies.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext eb1e679c-c6d1-4d88-ac45-036b0945d4ddBuilds on9
- Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression LearningMatthew Jagielski, Alina Oprea, Battista Biggio, Chang Liu et al.S&P 2018 · 867 citations
- Manipulation Attacks in Local Differential PrivacyAlbert Cheu, Adam D. Smith, Jonathan R. UllmanS&P 2021 · 122 citations
- Data Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy ProtocolsXiaoyu Cao, Jinyuan Jia, Neil Zhenqiang GongUSENIX Security 2021 · 100 citations
- PoisonRec: An Adaptive Data Poisoning Framework for Attacking Black-box Recommender SystemsJunshuai Song, Zhao Li, Zehong Hu, Yucheng Wu et al.ICDE 2020 · 83 citations
- FedRecAttack: Model Poisoning Attack to Federated RecommendationDazhong Rong, Shuai Ye, Ruoyan Zhao, Hon Ning Yuen et al.ICDE 2022 · 76 citations
Related papers
- AttriGuard: A Practical Defense Against Attribute Inference Attacks via Adversarial Machine LearningJinyuan Jia, Neil Zhenqiang GongUSENIX Security 2018 · 194 citations
- Model-Targeted Poisoning Attacks with Provable ConvergenceFnu Suya, Saeed Mahloujifar, Anshuman Suri, David Evans et al.ICML 2021 · 52 citations
- Theory of Continual Learning Against Data Poisoning AttacksYiting Hu, Lingjie DuanICML 2026
- Exploring Model Dynamics for Accumulative Poisoning DiscoveryJianing Zhu, Xiawei Guo, Jiangchao Yao, Chao Du et al.ICML 2023
- PORE: Provably Robust Recommender Systems against Data Poisoning AttacksJinyuan Jia, Yupei Liu, Yuepeng Hu, Neil Zhenqiang GongUSENIX Security 2023
