DRIFT: Learning from Abundant User Dissatisfaction in Real-World Preference Learning
Yifan Wang, Bolian Li, Junlin Wu, Zhaoxuan Tan, Zheli Liu, Ruqi Zhang, Ananth Grama, Qingkai Zeng
Abstract
Real-world large language model deployments (e.g., conversational AI systems, code generation assistants) naturally generate abundant implicit user dissatisfaction (DSAT) signals, as users iterate toward better answers through refinements, corrections, and expressed preferences, while explicit satisfaction (SAT) feedback is scarce. Existing preference learning approaches are poorly aligned with this data profile, as they rely on costly human annotations or assume plentiful positive responses. In this paper, we introduce DRIFT (Dissatisfaction-Refined Iterative preFerence Training), which anchors training on real-world DSAT signals and samples positives dynamically from the evolving policy. Empirically, DRIFT models trained on real-world WildFeedback datasets and synthetic UltraFeedback datasets achieve up to +6.23% (7B) / +7.61% (14B) on WildBench Task Score and up to +8.95% (7B) / +12.29% (14B) on AlpacaEval2 win rate over base models, outperforming strong baseline methods such as iterative DPO and SPIN. At larger scales, the improvements are particularly pronounced: 14B models trained with DRIFT surpass GPT-4o-mini on WildBench. Further analysis shows that DRIFT also preserves exploratory capacity, yielding more diverse high-reward solutions rather than collapsing to narrow subsets. Theoretically, we demonstrate that this design preserves preference margins and avoids the gradient degeneration. These results show that DRIFT is an effective and scalable recipe for real-world post-training that leverages the most abundant and informative signal.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext eae90baa-b59d-4998-bc25-0e32a37e413eBuilds on20
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Self-Rewarding Language ModelsWeizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li et al.ICML 2024 · 569 citations
- Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language ModelsZixiang Chen, Yihe Deng, Huizhuo Yuan, Kaixuan Ji et al.ICML 2024 · 527 citations
- WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the WildWenting Zhao, Xiang Ren, Jack Hessel, Claire Cardie et al.ICLR 2024 · 504 citations
Related papers
- WildFeedback: Aligning LLMs With In-situ User Interactions And FeedbackTaiwei Shi, Zhuoer Wang, Longqi Yang, Ying-Chun Lin et al.ACL 2026 · 35 citations
- User Feedback in Human-LLM Dialogues: A Lens to Understand Users But Noisy as a Learning SignalYuhan Liu, Michael J. Q. Zhang, Eunsol ChoiEMNLP 2025 · 12 citations
- WildReward: Learning Reward Models from In-the-Wild Human InteractionsHao Peng, Yunjia Qi, Xiaozhi Wang, Zijun Yao et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
- Aligning Large Language Models via Fully Self-Synthetic DataShangjian Yin, Zhepei Wei, Xinyu Zhu, Wei-Lin Chen et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- Less is More: Improving LLM Alignment via Preference Data SelectionXun Deng, Han Zhong, Rui Ai, Fuli Feng et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
