Efficient Extraction of EL-Ontology Deductive Modules
Hui Yang, Yue Ma, Nicole Bidoit
Abstract
Because widely used real-world ontologies are often complex and large, one important challenge has emerged: designing tools for users to focus on sub-ontologies corresponding to their specific interests. To this end, various modules have been introduced to provide concise ontology views. This work concentrates on extracting deductive modules that preserve logical entailments over a given vocabulary. Existing deductive module proposals are either inefficient from a computing point of view or unsatisfactory from a quality point of view because the modules extracted are not concise enough. For example, minimal modules guarantee the most concise results but their computation is highly time-consuming, while ⊥⊤ * -modules are easy to compute but usually they contain many redundant items. To overcome computation cost and lack of quality, we propose to compute two different kinds of deductive modules called pseudo-minimal modules and complete modules for EL-ontology. Our deductive module definitions rely on associating a tree representation with an ontology, and their computation is based on SAT encoding. Our experiments on real-world ontologies show that our pseudominimal modules are indeed minimal modules in almost all cases (98.9%), and computing pseudo-minimal modules is more efficient (99.79 times faster on average) than the stateof-the-art method Zoom for computing minimal modules. Also, our complete modules are more compact than ⊥⊤ *modules, but their computation time remains comparable. Finally, note that our proposal applies to EL-ontologies while Zoom only works for EL-terminologies.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext eadf3c11-fb3a-477b-870d-56b38d076dbdCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itRelated papers
- Efficient Computation of Signature-Restricted Views for Semantic Web OntologiesYizheng ZhaoWWW 2024 · 1 citation
- Creating Signature-Based Views for Description Logic Ontologies with Transitivity and Qualified Number RestrictionsYue Xiang, Xuan Wu, Chang Lu, Yizheng ZhaoWWW 2022 · 3 citations
- A Practical Approach to Forgetting in Description Logics with NominalsYizheng Zhao, Renate A. Schmidt, Yuejie Wang, Xuanming Zhang et al.AAAI 2020 · 6 citations
- Computing Views of OWL Ontologies for the Semantic WebJiaqi Li, Xuan Wu, Chang Lu, Wenxing Deng et al.WWW 2021 · 5 citations
- Minimal Macro-Based Rewritings of Formal Languages: Theory and Applications in Ontology Engineering (and Beyond)Christian Kindermann, Anne-Marie George, Bijan Parsia, Uli SattlerAAAI 2024 · 2 citations
