Exploring the Impact of Avatar Representations in AI Chatbot Tutors on Learning Experiences
Chek Tien Tan, Indriyati Atmosukarto, Budianto Tandianus, Songjia Shen, Steven Wong
Abstract
Despite the growing prominence of Artificial Intelligence (AI) chatbots used in education, there remains a significant gap in our understanding of how interface design elements, particularly avatar representations, influence learning experiences. This paper explores the impact of different AI chatbot avatar representations on students’ learning experiences through a mixed-methods within-subjects study, where participants interacted with three distinct types of AI chatbot interfaces with a common large language model (LLM) over a 14-week university course. Our findings reveal that preferences vary according to factors such as learning habits and learning activities. Avatar design also exhibits affordances for specific prompting behaviors, while the perceived human touch influenced learning experiences in nuanced ways. Additionally, real-world relationships with the individuals behind deepfakes influence these experiences. These insights suggest that the thoughtful integration of diverse avatar representations in AI chatbot systems for different learners and settings can greatly enhance learning experiences.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext eab6485d-88b3-4ad3-9f68-6badcc7524f9Cited by top-tier papers3
- Beyond a Conventional Chatbot: How AI Streamers Transcend Live Streaming Experiences from Viewers' PerspectivesYang Hu, Guo FreemanCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- What Are You Really Asking For? A Comparative 5W1H Analysis of Learner Questioning in CPR Training with IVAs in Screen-based and Augmented Reality EnvironmentsHyerim Park, Jinseok Hong, Heejeong Ko, Woontack WooCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- AgentHands: Generating Interactive Hand Gestures for Spatially Grounded Agent Conversations in XRZiyi Liu, David Li, Zhongyi Zhou, David Kim et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on9
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- CharacterMeet: Supporting Creative Writers' Entire Story Character Construction Processes Through Conversation with LLM-Powered Chatbot AvatarsHua Xuan Qin, Shan Jin, Ze Gao, Mingming Fan et al.CHI 2024 · 79 citations
- Understanding Public Perceptions of AI Conversational Agents: A Cross-Cultural AnalysisZihan Liu, Han Li, Anfan Chen, Renwen Zhang et al.CHI 2024 · 55 citations
- Can a Humorous Conversational Agent Enhance Learning Experience and Outcomes?Jessy Ceha, Ken Jen Lee, Elizabeth Nilsen, Joslin Goh et al.CHI 2021 · 43 citations
Related papers
- Campus AI vs. Commercial AI: Comparing How Students and Employees Perceive their University's LLM Chatbot vs. ChatGPTLeon Hannig, Annika Bush, Meltem Aksoy, Tim Trappen et al.CHI 2026
- It's All in the Personality: A Comparative Study of Real, Ideal, and Customized Virtual Instructors for AR Assembly TasksAbdul Mannan Mohammed, Martin McCarthy, Carsten Neumann, Gerd Bruder et al.IEEE VR 2026 · 2 citations
- The Personalization Paradox: Trade-offs Between Social Presence and Task Efficiency in Embodied AR InstructorsAbdul Mannan Mohammed, Martin McCarthy, Carsten Neumann, Gerd Bruder et al.CHI 2026 · 3 citations
- Exploring Teacher-Chatbot Interaction and Affect in Block-Based ProgrammingBahare Riahi, Ally Limke, Xiaoyi Tian, Viktoriia Storozhevykh et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
- CloChat: Understanding How People Customize, Interact, and Experience Personas in Large Language ModelsJuhye Ha, Hyeon Jeon, DaEun Han, Jinwook Seo et al.CHI 2024 · 66 citations
