Exploring Augmented Reality's Role in Enhancing Spatial Perception for Building Facade Retrofit Design for Non-experts
John Sermarini, Robert A. Michlowitz, Joseph J. LaViola, Lori C. Walters, Roger Azevedo, Joseph T. Kider Jr.
Abstract
Augmented Reality (AR) tools have demonstrated considerable promise to enhance creative architectural design and support the retrofitting problem-solving processes through on-site daylighting visualization. AR’s capacity to integrate embodied motion enhances the non-expert’s understanding of the spatial characteristics and design ramifications within the built environment for complex facade design. Motion provides insights and increases the accessibility of retrofitting, encouraging more energy-efficient rework as opposed to complete building reconstruction. This study investigates the decision-making outcomes and cognitive-physical load implications of integrating a Building Information Modeling-driven AR system into the retrofitting design process and how movement is best leveraged to understand daylighting impacts. We conducted a study with 128 non-expert participants, who were asked to choose a window facade retrofit to improve an interior space. We analyze the effects of head movement, head rotations, and eye movements to understand how embodied motion improves overall objective performance across several daylighting and energy design metrics. We found no significant difference in the overall decision-making outcome between those who used an AR tool or a conventional desktop approach and that greater eye movement in AR was related to non-experts better balancing the complicated impacts facades have on daylight, aesthetics, and energy. This study indicates future expansion of AR retrofitting tools should encourage more eye movement.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext eaa924d8-856d-4e3c-9086-e057aa6f0a3eBuilds on1
Related papers
- SafeSpect: Safety-First Augmented Reality Heads-up Display for Drone InspectionsPeisen Xu, Jérémie Garcia, Wei Tsang Ooi, Christophe JouffraisCHI 2025 · 8 citations
- Can AR Embedded Visualizations Foster Appropriate Reliance on AI in Spatial Decision-Making? A Comparative Study of AR X-Ray vs. 2D MinimapXianhao Carton Liu, Difan Jia, Tongyu Nie, Evan Suma Rosenberg et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- CollabAR - Investigating the Mediating Role of Mobile AR Interfaces on Co-Located Group CollaborationThomas Wells, Steven HoubenCHI 2020 · 37 citations
- Embodied Spatial Simulation: Enabling Embodied Interaction with Human Motion Simulation in Extended RealityYanni Mei, Jonas Wombacher, Wen-Jie Tseng, Veronika Krauß et al.IEEE VR 2026 · 1 citation
- Selection Performance and Reliability of Eye and Head Gaze Tracking Under Varying Light ConditionsAlexander Marquardt, Melissa Steininger, Christina Trepkowski, Martin Weier et al.IEEE VR 2024 · 3 citations
