Off-Policy Evaluation for Large Action Spaces via Conjunct Effect Modeling
Yuta Saito, Qingyang Ren, Thorsten Joachims
Abstract
We study off-policy evaluation (OPE) of contextual bandit policies for large discrete action spaces where conventional importance-weighting approaches suffer from excessive variance. To circumvent this variance issue, we propose a new estimator, called OffCEM, that is based on the conjunct effect model (CEM), a novel decomposition of the causal effect into a cluster effect and a residual effect. OffCEM applies importance weighting only to action clusters and addresses the residual causal effect through model-based reward estimation. We show that the proposed estimator is unbiased under a new condition, called local correctness, which only requires that the residual-effect model preserves the relative expected reward differences of the actions within each cluster. To best leverage the CEM and local correctness, we also propose a new two-step procedure for performing model-based estimation that minimizes bias in the first step and variance in the second step. We find that the resulting Of-fCEM estimator substantially improves bias and variance compared to a range of conventional estimators. Experiments demonstrate that OffCEM provides substantial improvements in OPE especially in the presence of many actions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ea603b32-65f0-46d9-900a-a8450e8af180Cited by top-tier papers18
- Logarithmic Smoothing for Pessimistic Off-Policy Evaluation, Selection and LearningOtmane Sakhi, Imad Aouali, Pierre Alquier, Nicolas ChopinNeurIPS 2024 · 21 citations
- Off-Policy Evaluation of Slate Bandit Policies via Optimizing AbstractionHaruka Kiyohara, Masahiro Nomura, Yuta SaitoWWW 2024 · 18 citations
- Off-Policy Evaluation for Large Action Spaces via Policy ConvolutionNoveen Sachdeva, Lequn Wang, Dawen Liang, Nathan Kallus et al.WWW 2024 · 17 citations
- On (Normalised) Discounted Cumulative Gain as an Off-Policy Evaluation Metric for Top-n RecommendationOlivier Jeunen, Ivan Potapov, Aleksei UstimenkoKDD 2024 · 16 citations
- Towards Assessing and Benchmarking Risk-Return Tradeoff of Off-Policy EvaluationHaruka Kiyohara, Ren Kishimoto, Kosuke Kawakami, Ken Kobayashi et al.ICLR 2024 · 15 citations
Builds on11
- Doubly robust off-policy evaluation with shrinkageYi Su, Maria Dimakopoulou, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Miroslav DudíkICML 2020 · 128 citations
- Off-Policy Evaluation for Large Action Spaces via EmbeddingsYuta Saito, Thorsten JoachimsICML 2022 · 62 citations
- Subgaussian and Differentiable Importance Sampling for Off-Policy Evaluation and LearningAlberto Maria Metelli, Alessio Russo, Marcello RestelliNeurIPS 2021 · 55 citations
- Adaptive Estimator Selection for Off-Policy EvaluationYi Su, Pavithra Srinath, Akshay KrishnamurthyICML 2020 · 55 citations
- Understanding the Curse of Horizon in Off-Policy Evaluation via Conditional Importance SamplingYao Liu, Pierre-Luc Bacon, Emma BrunskillICML 2020 · 49 citations
Related papers
- POTEC: Off-Policy Contextual Bandits for Large Action Spaces via Policy DecompositionYuta Saito, Jihan Yao, Thorsten JoachimsICLR 2025
- Marginal Density Ratio for Off-Policy Evaluation in Contextual BanditsMuhammad Faaiz Taufiq, Arnaud Doucet, Rob Cornish, Jean-Francois TonNeurIPS 2023 · 14 citations
- Local Metric Learning for Off-Policy Evaluation in Contextual Bandits with Continuous ActionsHaanvid Lee, Jongmin Lee, Yunseon Choi, Wonseok Jeon et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 7 citations
- Off-Policy Learning in Large Action Spaces: Optimization Matters More Than EstimationImad AOUALI, Otmane SakhiICML 2026
- Local Clustering in Contextual Multi-Armed BanditsYikun Ban, Jingrui HeWWW 2021 · 51 citations
