EMNLP Findings2025
Reliability Crisis of Reference-free Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction
Takumi Goto, Yusuke Sakai, Taro Watanabe
Abstract
Reference-free evaluation metrics for grammatical error correction (GEC) have achieved high correlation with human judgments. However, these metrics are not designed to evaluate adversarial systems that aim to obtain unjustifiably high scores. The existence of such systems undermines the reliability of automatic evaluation, as it can mislead users in selecting appropriate GEC systems. In this study, we propose adversarial attack strategies for four referencefree metrics: SOME, Scribendi, IMPARA, and LLM-based metrics, and demonstrate that our adversarial systems outperform the current state-of-the-art. These findings highlight the need for more robust evaluation methods. Our code is available at: https://github.com/ gotutiyan/attack-gec-metrics.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Builds on1
Related papers
- IMPARA-GED: Grammatical Error Detection is Boosting Reference-free Grammatical Error Quality EstimatorYusuke Sakai, Takumi Goto, Taro WatanabeACL Findings 2025 · 1 citation
- CLEME2.0: Towards Interpretable Evaluation by Disentangling Edits for Grammatical Error CorrectionJingheng Ye, Zishan Xu, Yinghui Li, Linlin Song et al.ACL 2025
- CLEME: Debiasing Multi-reference Evaluation for Grammatical Error CorrectionJingheng Ye, Yinghui Li, Qingyu Zhou, Yangning Li et al.EMNLP 2023 · 5 citations
- Spurious Correlations in Reference-Free Evaluation of Text GenerationEsin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Tatsunori HashimotoACL 2022
- DSGram: Dynamic Weighting Sub-Metrics for Grammatical Error Correction in the Era of Large Language ModelsJinxiang Xie, Yilin Li, Xunjian Yin, Xiaojun WanAAAI 2025 · 2 citations
