CONFETTI: Conversational Function-Calling Evaluation Through Turn-Level Interactions
Tamer Alkhouli, Katerina Margatina, James Gung, Raphael Shu, Claudia Zaghi, Monica Sunkara, Yi Zhang
Abstract
We introduce Conversational Function-Calling Evaluation Through Turn-Level Interactions (CONFETTI), a conversational benchmark 1 designed to evaluate the function-calling capabilities and response quality of large language models (LLMs). Current benchmarks lack comprehensive assessment of LLMs in complex conversational scenarios. CONFETTI addresses this gap through 109 human-simulated conversations, comprising 313 user turns and covering 86 APIs. These conversations explicitly target various conversational complexities, such as follow-ups, goal correction and switching, ambiguous and implicit goals. We perform off-policy turn-level evaluation using this benchmark targeting function-calling. Our benchmark also incorporates dialog act annotations to assess agent responses. We evaluate a series of stateof-the-art LLMs and analyze their performance with respect to the number of available APIs, conversation lengths, and chained function calling. Our results reveal that while some models are able to handle long conversations, and leverage more than 20+ APIs successfully, other models struggle with longer context or when increasing the number of APIs. We also report that the performance on chained function-calls is severely limited across the models. Overall, the top performing models on CONFETTI are Nova Pro (40.01%), Claude Sonnet v3.5 (35.46%) and Llama 3.1 405B (33.19%) followed by command-r-plus (31.18%) and Mistral-Large-2407 (30.07%).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ea28dab5-c6cf-4740-bd11-9d2f19a72342Builds on9
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- Gorilla: Large Language Model Connected with Massive APIsShishir G. Patil, Tianjun Zhang, Xin Wang, Joseph E. GonzalezNeurIPS 2024 · 1,715 citations
- ToolLLM: Facilitating Large Language Models to Master 16000+ Real-world APIsYujia Qin, Shihao Liang, Yining Ye, Kunlun Zhu et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,469 citations
- G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using Gpt-4 with Better Human AlignmentYang Liu, Dan Iter, Yichong Xu, Shuohang Wang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 549 citations
- Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated SandboxYangjun Ruan, Honghua Dong, Andrew Wang, Silviu Pitis et al.ICLR 2024 · 292 citations
Related papers
- SolContractEval: A Benchmark for Evaluating Contract-Level Solidity Code GenerationZhifan Ye, Jiachi Chen, Zhenzhe Shao, Lingfeng Bao et al.ASE 2025
- The Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL): From Tool Use to Agentic Evaluation of Large Language ModelsShishir G. Patil, Huanzhi Mao, Fanjia Yan, Charlie Cheng-Jie Ji et al.ICML 2025
- EvaLearn: Quantifying the Learning Capability and Efficiency of LLMs via Sequential Problem SolvingShihan Dou, Ming Zhang, Chenhao Huang, Jiayi Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- ComplexCodeEval: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Code Models on More Complex CodeJia Feng, Jiachen Liu, Cuiyun Gao, Chun Yong Chong et al.ASE 2024 · 7 citations
- TRAJECT-Bench: A Trajectory-Aware Benchmark for Evaluating Agentic Tool UsePengfei He, Zhenwei Dai, Bing He, Hui Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 46 citations
