USENIX Security2023Top-tier venue
Account Verification on Social Media: User Perceptions and Paid Enrollment
Madelyne Xiao, Mona Wang, Anunay Kulshrestha, Jonathan R. Mayer
Abstract
We investigate how users perceive social media account verification, how those perceptions compare to platform practices, and what happens when a gap emerges. We use recent changes in Twitter's verification process as a natural experiment, where the meaning and types of verification indicators rapidly and significantly shift. The project consists of two components: a user survey and a measurement of verified Twitter accounts. In the survey study, we ask a demographically representative sample of U.S. respondents (n = 299) about social media account verification requirements both in general and for particular platforms. We also ask about experiences with online information sources and digital literacy. More than half of respondents misunderstand Twitter's criteria for blue check account verification, and over 80% of respondents misunderstand Twitter's new gold and gray check verification indicators. Our analysis of survey responses suggests that people who are older or have lower digital literacy may be modestly more likely to misunderstand Twitter verification. In the measurement study, we randomly sample 15 million English language tweets from October 2022. We obtain account verification status for the associated accounts in November 2022, just before Twitter's verification changes, and we collect verification status again in January 2022. The resulting longitudinal dataset of 2.85 million accounts enables us to characterize the accounts that gained and lost verification following Twitter's changes. We find that accounts posting conservative political content, exhibiting positive views about Elon Musk, and promoting cryptocurrencies disproportionately obtain blue check verification after Twitter's changes. We close by offering recommendations for improving account verification indicators and processes.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Identifying Risky Vendors in Cryptocurrency P2P MarketplacesTaro Tsuchiya, Alejandro Cuevas Villalba, Nicolas ChristinWWW 2024 · 9 citations
- "Please don't send that bot anything": A Mixed-methods Study of Personal Impersonation Attacks Targeting Digital Payments on Social MediaHoang Dai Nguyen, Sumit Dhungana, Madhulika Itha, Phani VadrevuUSENIX Security 2025
Builds on1
Related papers
- Disproportionate Removals and Differing Content Moderation Experiences for Conservative, Transgender, and Black Social Media Users: Marginalization and Moderation Gray AreasOliver L. Haimson, Daniel Delmonaco, Peipei Nie, Andrea WegnerCSCW 2021 · 287 citations
- Twitter has a Binary Privacy Setting, are Users Aware of How It Works?Dilara Keküllüoglu, Kami Vaniea, Maria K. Wolters, Walid MagdyCSCW 2023 · 1 citation
- Did the Roll-Out of Community Notes Reduce Engagement With Misinformation on X/Twitter?Yuwei Chuai, Haoye Tian, Nicolas Pröllochs, Gabriele LenziniCSCW 2024 · 62 citations
- Diffusion of Community Fact-Checked Misinformation on TwitterChiara Patricia Drolsbach, Nicolas PröllochsCSCW 2023 · 47 citations
- Birds of a feather don't fact-check each other: Partisanship and the evaluation of news in Twitter's Birdwatch crowdsourced fact-checking programJennifer Allen, Cameron Martel, David G. RandCHI 2022 · 104 citations
