Planning-Aware Code Infilling via Horizon-Length Prediction
Yifeng Ding, Hantian Ding, Shiqi Wang, Qing Sun, Varun Kumar, Zijian Wang
Abstract
Fill-in-the-Middle (FIM), or infilling, has become integral to code language models, enabling generation of missing code given both left and right contexts. However, the current FIM training paradigm which performs next-token prediction (NTP) over reordered sequence often leads to models struggling to generate content that aligns well with the surrounding context. We hypothesize that NTP alone is insufficient for models to learn effective planning conditioned on the distant right context, a critical factor for successful code infilling. To overcome this, we propose Horizon-Length Prediction (HLP), a novel training objective that teaches models to predict the number of remaining middle tokens at each step. HLP advances FIM with lookahead planning, enabling models to inherently learn infilling boundaries for arbitrary left and right contexts without relying on dataset-specific post-processing. Our evaluation across different model families and sizes shows that HLP significantly improves FIM performance by up to 24% relatively on diverse benchmarks, across file-level and repository-level. Furthermore, the enhanced planning capability gained through HLP boosts model performance on code reasoning. Importantly, HLP incurs negligible training overhead and no additional inference cost, ensuring its practicality for real-world scenarios. 1 We opt to use PSM setting in this work given our base models DeepSeek-Coder and StarCoder2 were both pre-trained with PSM. We expect that our method is generalizable to SPM setting as well.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e9861df4-ce01-493a-b7eb-8efbc46b0dcaBuilds on11
- Better & Faster Large Language Models via Multi-token PredictionFabian Gloeckle, Badr Youbi Idrissi, Baptiste Rozière, David Lopez-Paz et al.ICML 2024 · 286 citations
- CRUXEval: A Benchmark for Code Reasoning, Understanding and ExecutionAlex Gu, Baptiste Rozière, Hugh James Leather, Armando Solar-Lezama et al.ICML 2024 · 270 citations
- CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program SynthesisErik Nijkamp, Bo Pang, Hiroaki Hayashi, Lifu Tu et al.ICLR 2023 · 234 citations
- InCoder: A Generative Model for Code Infilling and SynthesisDaniel Fried, Armen Aghajanyan, Jessy Lin, Sida Wang et al.ICLR 2023 · 140 citations
- RepoCoder: Repository-Level Code Completion Through Iterative Retrieval and GenerationFengji Zhang, Bei Chen, Yue Zhang, Jacky Keung et al.EMNLP 2023 · 110 citations
Related papers
- Evaluation of LLMs on Syntax-Aware Code Fill-in-the-Middle TasksLinyuan Gong, Sida Wang, Mostafa Elhoushi, Alvin CheungICML 2024 · 33 citations
- Meet in the Middle: A New Pre-training ParadigmAnh Nguyen, Nikos Karampatziakis, Weizhu ChenNeurIPS 2023 · 29 citations
- Mask-Enhanced Autoregressive Prediction: Pay Less Attention to Learn MoreXialie Zhuang, Zhikai Jia, Jianjin Li, Zhenyu Zhang et al.ICML 2025
- JumpCoder: Go Beyond Autoregressive Coder via Online ModificationMouxiang Chen, Hao Tian, Zhongxin Liu, Xiaoxue Ren et al.ACL 2024 · 4 citations
- Beyond Multi-Token Prediction: Pretraining LLMs with Future SummariesDivyat Mahajan, Sachin Goyal, Badr Youbi Idrissi, Mohammad Pezeshki et al.ICLR 2026 · 15 citations
