Crack in the Armor: Underlying Infrastructure Threats to RPKI Publication Point Reachability
Yunhao Liu, Jessie Hui Wang, Yuedong Xu, Zongpeng Li, Yangyang Wang, Jilong Wang
Abstract
The effectiveness of the RPKI in preventing BGP prefix hijacking relies not only on the presence of valid ROAs but also on the successful retrieval of ROAs from publication points (PPs) by relying parties (RPs). Guaranteeing the integrity of data and uninterrupted connectivity during this retrieval process necessitates the proper implementation of security measures in the underlying infrastructure, textiti.e., the DNS and routing infrastructures. In this paper, we collect information on the specific DNS and routing infrastructures used during the information retrieval process and analyze the infrastructure threats to the reachability of RPKI PPs. Regarding the DNS infrastructure, we report that 31 PPs (48.4%) are susceptible to DNS spoofing attacks and pinpoint the reasons for the appearance of DNSSEC-unprotected zones, such as CNAME redirections to unprotected zones and NS delegations to third-party insecure DNS servers. Regarding the routing infrastructure for communicating with nameservers, our analysis shows that a significant 55 PPs (85.9%) have at least one ROA-unprotected nameserver on their resolution paths, and highlights that the absence of ROA registration for gTLD nameservers accounts for vulnerabilities in 44 of these 55 PPs. Regarding the routing infrastructure for RP-PP communications, we report that 5 PPs fail to register ROAs for the IP addresses of their PP servers. Simulations of routing hijack attacks show that, in the case of the most vulnerable PP, up to 65% to 83% of ASes may experience a loss of connectivity to the PP. Furthermore, we investigate the deterministic and probabilistic dependencies among publication points and uncover a critical issue: some RIR-operated PPs rely on less secure lower-level PPs, which can significantly amplify the impact of vulnerabilities within insecure PPs, potentially leading to cascading failures.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e9811f1e-96b1-4506-aa5e-692232ddc8f1Builds on12
- Are We There Yet? On RPKI's Deployment and SecurityYossi Gilad, Avichai Cohen, Amir Herzberg, Michael Schapira et al.NDSS 2017 · 108 citations
- SICO: Surgical Interception Attacks by Manipulating BGP CommunitiesHenry Birge-Lee, Liang Wang, Jennifer Rexford, Prateek MittalCCS 2019 · 51 citations
- Beyond Limits: How to Disable Validators in Secure NetworksTomas Hlavacek, Philipp Jeitner, Donika Mirdita, Haya Schulmann et al.SIGCOMM 2023 · 14 citations
- Behind the Scenes of RPKITomas Hlavacek, Philipp Jeitner, Donika Mirdita, Haya Schulmann et al.CCS 2022 · 14 citations
- SoK: An Introspective Analysis of RPKI SecurityDonika Mirdita, Haya Schulmann, Michael WaidnerUSENIX Security 2025
Related papers
- Stalloris: RPKI Downgrade AttackTomas Hlavacek, Philipp Jeitner, Donika Mirdita, Haya Schulmann et al.USENIX Security 2022
- Keep Your Friends Close, but Your Routeservers Closer: Insights into RPKI Validation in the InternetTomas Hlavacek, Haya Schulmann, Niklas Vogel, Michael WaidnerUSENIX Security 2023
- Demystifying RPKI-Invalid Prefixes: Hidden Causes and Security RisksWeitong Li, Tao Wan, Tijay ChungNDSS 2026
- ImpROV: Measurement and Practical Mitigation of Collateral Damage in RPKI Route Origin ValidationWeitong Li, Yuze Li, Taejoong ChungUSENIX Security 2025
- Right the Ship: Assessing the Legitimacy of Invalid Routes in RPKIAndong Chen, Yangyang Wang, Jia Zhang, Mingwei XuCCS 2025
