Deriving Causal Order from Single-Variable Interventions: Guarantees & Algorithm
Mathieu Chevalley, Patrick Schwab, Arash Mehrjou
Abstract
Targeted and uniform interventions to a system are crucial for unveiling causal relationships. While several methods have been developed to leverage interventional data for causal structure learning, their practical application in real-world scenarios often remains challenging. Recent benchmark studies have highlighted these difficulties, even when large numbers of single-variable intervention samples are available. In this work, we demonstrate, both theoretically and empirically, that such datasets contain a wealth of causal information that can be effectively extracted under realistic assumptions about the data distribution. More specifically, we introduce a novel variant of interventional faithfulness, which relies on comparisons between the marginal distributions of each variable across observational and interventional settings, and we introduce a score on causal orders. Under this assumption, we are able to prove strong theoretical guarantees on the optimum of our score that also hold for large-scale settings. To empirically verify our theory, we introduce INTERSORT, an algorithm designed to infer the causal order from datasets containing large numbers of single-variable interventions by approximately optimizing our score. INTERSORT outperforms baselines (GIES, DCDI, PC and EASE) on almost all simulated data settings replicating common benchmarks in the field. Our proposed novel approach to modeling interventional datasets thus offers a promising avenue for advancing causal inference, highlighting significant potential for further enhancements under realistic assumptions.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e915467d-8b40-4517-b2bd-4d0f219c4149Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on8
- Differentiable Causal Discovery from Interventional DataPhilippe Brouillard, Sébastien Lachapelle, Alexandre Lacoste, Simon Lacoste-Julien et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 295 citations
- Beware of the Simulated DAG! Causal Discovery Benchmarks May Be Easy to GameAlexander G. Reisach, Christof Seiler, Sebastian WeichwaldNeurIPS 2021 · 213 citations
- Score Matching Enables Causal Discovery of Nonlinear Additive Noise ModelsPaul Rolland, Volkan Cevher, Matthäus Kleindessner, Chris Russell et al.ICML 2022 · 123 citations
- Amortized Inference for Causal Structure LearningLars Lorch, Scott Sussex, Jonas Rothfuss, Andreas Krause et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 118 citations
- Large-Scale Differentiable Causal Discovery of Factor GraphsRomain Lopez, Jan-Christian Hütter, Jonathan K. Pritchard, Aviv RegevNeurIPS 2022 · 78 citations
Related papers
- Trust Your 𝛁: Gradient-based Intervention Targeting for Causal DiscoveryMateusz Olko, Michal Zajac, Aleksandra Nowak, Nino Scherrer et al.NeurIPS 2023
- Less Greedy Equivalence SearchAdiba Ejaz, Elias BareinboimNeurIPS 2025 · 1 citation
- Information-Theoretic Causal Discovery and Intervention Detection over Multiple EnvironmentsOsman Mian, Michael Kamp, Jilles VreekenAAAI 2023 · 12 citations
- Identifiability Guarantees for Causal Disentanglement from Soft InterventionsJiaqi Zhang, Kristjan H. Greenewald, Chandler Squires, Akash Srivastava et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 120 citations
- Causal Structure Learning for Latent Intervened Non-stationary DataChenxi Liu, Kun KuangICML 2023 · 14 citations
