Approximating Binary Longest Common Subsequence in Almost-Linear Time
Xiaoyu He, Ray Li
Abstract
The Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) is a fundamental string similarity measure, and computing the LCS of two strings is a classic algorithms question. A textbook dynamic programming algorithm gives an exact algorithm in quadratic time, and this is essentially best possible under plausible finegrained complexity assumptions, so a natural problem is to find faster approximation algorithms. When the inputs are two binary strings, there is a simple 1 2 -approximation in linear time: compute the longest common all-0s or all-1s subsequence. It has been open whether a better approximation is possible even in truly subquadratic time. Rubinstein and Song showed that the answer is yes under the assumption that the two input strings have equal lengths. We settle the question, generalizing their result to unequal length strings, proving that, for any ε ą 0, there exists δ ą 0 and a p 1 2 δq-approximation algorithm for binary LCS that runs in n 1ε time. As a consequence of our result and a result of Akmal and Vassilevska-Williams, for any ε ą 0, there exists a p 1 q δq-approximation for LCS over q-ary strings in n 1ε time.
Our techniques build on the recent work of Guruswami, He, and Li who proved new bounds for error-correcting codes tolerating deletion errors. They prove a combinatorial "structure lemma" for strings which classifies them according to their oscillation patterns. We prove and use an algorithmic generalization of this structure lemma, which may be of independent interest.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e8a7fa8c-acfa-4d6f-b42c-4c22f0fa64eeCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- Edit Distance in Near-Linear Time: it's a Constant FactorAlexandr Andoni, Negev Shekel NosatzkiFOCS 2020 · 28 citations
- Reducing approximate Longest Common Subsequence to approximate Edit DistanceAviad Rubinstein, Zhao SongSODA 2020 · 24 citations
- Does preprocessing help in fast sequence comparisons?Elazar Goldenberg, Aviad Rubinstein, Barna SahaSTOC 2020 · 15 citations
- The zero-rate threshold for adversarial bit-deletions is less than 1/2Venkatesan Guruswami, Xiaoyu He, Ray LiFOCS 2021 · 6 citations
- Constant factor approximations to edit distance on far input pairs in nearly linear timeMichal Koucký, Michael E. SaksSTOC 2020 · 5 citations
Related papers
- Improved Algorithms for Edit Distance and LCS: Beyond Worst CaseMahdi Boroujeni, Masoud Seddighin, Saeed SeddighinSODA 2020 · 8 citations
- Constant-factor approximation of near-linear edit distance in near-linear timeJoshua Brakensiek, Aviad RubinsteinSTOC 2020 · 1 citation
- Near-Optimal Quantum Algorithms for Bounded Edit Distance and Lempel-Ziv FactorizationDaniel Gibney, Ce Jin, Tomasz Kociumaka, Sharma V. ThankachanSODA 2024 · 7 citations
- Quantum Speed-ups for String Synchronizing Sets, Longest Common Substring, and k-mismatch MatchingCe Jin, Jakob NoglerSODA 2023 · 10 citations
- Estimating the Longest Increasing Subsequence in Nearly Optimal TimeAlexandr Andoni, Negev Shekel Nosatzki, Sandip Sinha, Clifford SteinFOCS 2022 · 4 citations
