Influence Estimation for Generative Adversarial Networks
Naoyuki Terashita, Hiroki Ohashi, Yuichi Nonaka, Takashi Kanemaru
Abstract
Identifying harmful instances, whose absence in a training dataset improves model performance, is important for building better machine learning models. Although previous studies have succeeded in estimating harmful instances under supervised settings, they cannot be trivially extended to generative adversarial networks (GANs). This is because previous approaches require that (i) the absence of a training instance directly affects the loss value and that (ii) the change in the loss directly measures the harmfulness of the instance for the performance of a model. In GAN training, however, neither of the requirements is satisfied. This is because, (i) the generator's loss is not directly affected by the training instances as they are not part of the generator's training steps, and (ii) the values of GAN's losses normally do not capture the generative performance of a model. To this end, (i) we propose an influence estimation method that uses the Jacobian of the gradient of the generator's loss with respect to the discriminator's parameters (and vice versa) to trace how the absence of an instance in the discriminator's training affects the generator's parameters, and (ii) we propose a novel evaluation scheme, in which we assess harmfulness of each training instance on the basis of how GAN evaluation metric (e.g., inception score) is expected to change due to the removal of the instance. We experimentally verified that our influence estimation method correctly inferred the changes in GAN evaluation metrics. We also demonstrated that the removal of the identified harmful instances effectively improved the model's generative performance with respect to various GAN evaluation metrics.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e899e65a-b619-485f-948e-7e4a0a80a935Cited by top-tier papers6
- On Memorization in Probabilistic Deep Generative ModelsGerrit J. J. van den Burg, Christopher K. I. WilliamsNeurIPS 2021 · 92 citations
- Intriguing Properties of Data Attribution on Diffusion ModelsXiaosen Zheng, Tianyu Pang, Chao Du, Jing Jiang et al.ICLR 2024 · 41 citations
- Understanding Instance-based Interpretability of Variational Auto-EncodersZhifeng Kong, Kamalika ChaudhuriNeurIPS 2021 · 32 citations
- Debugging and Explaining Metric Learning Approaches: An Influence Function Based PerspectiveRuofan Liu, Yun Lin, Xianglin Yang, Jin Song DongNeurIPS 2022 · 4 citations
- Diffusion Attribution Score: Evaluating Training Data Influence in Diffusion ModelsJinxu Lin, Linwei Tao, Minjing Dong, Chang XuICLR 2025
Builds on2
Related papers
- Gradient Normalization for Generative Adversarial NetworksYi-Lun Wu, Hong-Han Shuai, Zhi Rui Tam, Hong-Yu ChiuICCV 2021 · 78 citations
- Resolving Training Biases via Influence-based Data RelabelingShuming Kong, Yanyan Shen, Linpeng HuangICLR 2022 · 71 citations
- Mixup Training for Generative Models to Defend Membership Inference AttacksZhe Ji, Qiansiqi Hu, Liyao Xiang, Chenghu ZhouINFOCOM 2023 · 3 citations
- Unlearning Traces the Influential Training Data of Language ModelsMasaru Isonuma, Ivan TitovACL 2024 · 1 citation
- Effectively Unbiased FID and Inception Score and Where to Find ThemMin Jin Chong, David A. ForsythCVPR 2020
