Leveraging Review Properties for Effective Recommendation
Xi Wang, Iadh Ounis, Craig Macdonald
Abstract
Many state-of-the-art recommendation systems leverage explicit item reviews posted by users by considering their usefulness in representing the users’ preferences and describing the items’ attributes. These posted reviews may have various associated properties, such as their length, their age since they were posted, or their rating of the item. However, it remains unclear how these different review properties contribute to the usefulness of their corresponding reviews in addressing the recommendation task. In particular, users show distinct preferences when considering different aspects of the reviews (i.e. properties) for making decisions about the items. Hence, it is important to model the relationship between the reviews’ properties and the usefulness of the reviews while learning the users’ preferences and the items’ attributes. In this paper, we propose to model the reviews with their associated available properties. We introduce a novel review properties-based recommendation model (RPRM) that learns which review properties are more important than others in capturing the usefulness of reviews, thereby enhancing the recommendation results. Furthermore, inspired by the users’ information adoption framework, we integrate two loss functions and a negative sampling strategy into our proposed RPRM model, to ensure that the properties of reviews are correlated with the users’ preferences. We examine the effectiveness of RPRM using the well-known Yelp and Amazon datasets. Our results show that RPRM significantly outperforms a classical and five existing state-of-the-art baselines. Moreover, we experimentally show the advantages of using our proposed loss functions and negative sampling strategy, which further enhance the recommendation performances of RPRM.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e8621dd4-827b-4d4f-90b4-2b5fa72e9b05Builds on3
- ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language RepresentationsZhenzhong Lan, Mingda Chen, Sebastian Goodman, Kevin Gimpel et al.ICLR 2020 · 7,418 citations
- An Attentional Recurrent Neural Network for Personalized Next Location RecommendationQing Guo, Zhu Sun, Jie Zhang, Yin-Leng ThengAAAI 2020 · 133 citations
- Déjà vu: A Contextualized Temporal Attention Mechanism for Sequential RecommendationJibang Wu, Renqin Cai, Hongning WangWWW 2020 · 66 citations
Related papers
- Rating-Aware Homogeneous Review Graphs and User Likes/Dislikes Differentiation for Effective RecommendationsJiwon Son, Hyunjoon Kim, Sang-Wook KimSIGIR 2025 · 3 citations
- Reliable Recommendation with Review-level ExplanationsYanzhang Lyu, Hongzhi Yin, Jun Liu, Mengyue Liu et al.ICDE 2021 · 17 citations
- Learning Attribute as Explicit Relation for Sequential RecommendationGang Liu, Fan Yang, Yang Jiao, Alireza Bagheri Garakani et al.KDD 2025 · 1 citation
- Mining User Preferences from Online Reviews with the Genre-aware Personalized Neural Topic ModelRui Wang, Jiahao Lu, Xincheng Lv, Shuyu Chang et al.WWW 2025
- Dual Learning for Explainable Recommendation: Towards Unifying User Preference Prediction and Review GenerationPeijie Sun, Le Wu, Kun Zhang, Yanjie Fu et al.WWW 2020 · 94 citations
