MonoFlow: Rethinking Divergence GANs via the Perspective of Wasserstein Gradient Flows
Mingxuan Yi, Zhanxing Zhu, Song Liu
Abstract
The conventional understanding of adversarial training in generative adversarial networks (GANs) is that the discriminator is trained to estimate a divergence, and the generator learns to minimize this divergence. We argue that despite the fact that many variants of GANs were developed following this paradigm, the current theoretical understanding of GANs and their practical algorithms are inconsistent. In this paper, we leverage Wasserstein gradient flows which characterize the evolution of particles in the sample space, to gain theoretical insights and algorithmic inspiration of GANs. We introduce a unified generative modeling framework - MonoFlow: the particle evolution is rescaled via a monotonically increasing mapping of the log density ratio. Under our framework, adversarial training can be viewed as a procedure first obtaining MonoFlow's vector field via training the discriminator and the generator learns to draw the particle flow defined by the corresponding vector field. We also reveal the fundamental difference between variational divergence minimization and adversarial training. This analysis helps us to identify what types of generator loss functions can lead to the successful training of GANs and suggest that GANs may have more loss designs beyond the literature (e.g., non-saturated loss), as long as they realize MonoFlow. Consistent empirical studies are included to validate the effectiveness of our framework.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e84be409-a3b1-4e69-adbe-eaff904ff5f0Cited by top-tier papers6
- Improved Distribution Matching Distillation for Fast Image SynthesisTianwei Yin, Michaël Gharbi, Taesung Park, Richard Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 728 citations
- One-Step Diffusion with Distribution Matching DistillationTianwei Yin, Michaël Gharbi, Richard Zhang, Eli Shechtman et al.CVPR 2024 · 75 citations
- Minimizing f-Divergences by Interpolating Velocity FieldsSong Liu, Jiahao Yu, Jack Simons, Mingxuan Yi et al.ICML 2024 · 7 citations
- Denoising Trajectory Biases for Zero-Shot AI-Generated Image DetectionYachao Liang, Min Yu, Gang Li, Jianguo Jiang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- Distribution Backtracking Builds A Faster Convergence Trajectory for Diffusion DistillationShengyuan Zhang, Ling Yang, Zejian Li, An Zhao et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on5
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential EquationsYang Song, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Diederik P. Kingma, Abhishek Kumar et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,270 citations
- Generalized Energy Based ModelsMichael Arbel, Liang Zhou, Arthur GrettonICLR 2021 · 254 citations
- A Neural Tangent Kernel Perspective of GANsJean-Yves Franceschi, Emmanuel de Bézenac, Ibrahim Ayed, Mickaël Chen et al.ICML 2022 · 29 citations
- Refining Deep Generative Models via Discriminator Gradient FlowAbdul Fatir Ansari, Ming Liang Ang, Harold SohICLR 2021 · 3 citations
Related papers
- Deep MMD Gradient Flow without adversarial trainingAlexandre Galashov, Valentin De Bortoli, Arthur GrettonICLR 2025 · 1 citation
- A Unifying View of Variational Generative Wasserstein FlowsPaul Caucheteux, Clément Bonet, Anna KorbaICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Do GANs always have Nash equilibria?Farzan Farnia, Asuman E. OzdaglarICML 2020 · 93 citations
- Unifying GANs and Score-Based Diffusion as Generative Particle ModelsJean-Yves Franceschi, Mike Gartrell, Ludovic Dos Santos, Thibaut Issenhuth et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 32 citations
- Bridging the Gap Between f-GANs and Wasserstein GANsJiaming Song, Stefano ErmonICML 2020 · 45 citations
