Exact Policy Recovery in Offline RL with Both Heavy-Tailed Rewards and Data Corruption
Yiding Chen, Xuezhou Zhang, Qiaomin Xie, Xiaojin Zhu
Abstract
We study offline reinforcement learning (RL) with heavytailed reward distribution and data corruption: (i) Moving beyond subGaussian reward distribution, we require only a bounded (1 + γ)-th moment for γ ∈ (0, 1]; (ii) We allow corruptions where an attacker can arbitrarily modify -fraction of the rewards and transitions in the dataset. We first derive a sufficient optimality condition for generalized Pessimistic Value Iteration (PEVI), which allows various estimators with proper confidence bounds and can be applied to multiple learning settings. In order to handle the data corruption and heavy-tailed reward setting, we prove that the trimmed-mean estimation achieves a minimax optimal error rate O σ γ 1+γ
for robust mean estimation under heavy-tailed distributions. In the PEVI algorithm, we plug in the trimmed mean estimation and the confidence bound to solve the robust offline RL problem. Standard analysis reveals that data corruption induces a bias term O Hσ γ 1+γ + H in the suboptimality gap, which gives the false impression that any data corruption prevents optimal policy learning. By using the optimality condition for the generalized PEVI, we show that as long as the bias term is less than the "action gap", the policy returned by PEVI achieves the optimal value given sufficient data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e83d03b4-2a22-4e0e-84a0-7697facff19bCited by top-tier papers2
- ADG: Ambient Diffusion-Guided Dataset Recovery for Corruption-Robust Offline Reinforcement LearningZeyuan Liu, Zhihe Yang, Jiawei Xu, Rui Yang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Tackling Data Corruption in Offline Reinforcement Learning via Sequence ModelingJiawei Xu, Rui Yang, Shuang Qiu, Feng Luo et al.ICLR 2025
Builds on11
- Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?Ying Jin, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran WangICML 2021 · 419 citations
- Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of PessimismParia Rashidinejad, Banghua Zhu, Cong Ma, Jiantao Jiao et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 373 citations
- Policy Finetuning: Bridging Sample-Efficient Offline and Online Reinforcement LearningTengyang Xie, Nan Jiang, Huan Wang, Caiming Xiong et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 207 citations
- What are the Statistical Limits of Offline RL with Linear Function Approximation?Ruosong Wang, Dean P. Foster, Sham M. KakadeICLR 2021 · 172 citations
- Adaptive Reward-Poisoning Attacks against Reinforcement LearningXuezhou Zhang, Yuzhe Ma, Adish Singla, Xiaojin ZhuICML 2020 · 154 citations
Related papers
- Corruption-Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning with General Function ApproximationChenlu Ye, Rui Yang, Quanquan Gu, Tong ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 37 citations
- Towards Robust Offline Reinforcement Learning under Diverse Data CorruptionRui Yang, Han Zhong, Jiawei Xu, Amy Zhang et al.ICLR 2024 · 28 citations
- Differentially Private Episodic Reinforcement Learning with Heavy-tailed RewardsYulian Wu, Xingyu Zhou, Sayak Ray Chowdhury, Di WangICML 2023 · 4 citations
- Breaking the Moments Condition Barrier: No-Regret Algorithm for Bandits with Super Heavy-Tailed PayoffsHan Zhong, Jiayi Huang, Lin Yang, Liwei WangNeurIPS 2021 · 12 citations
- Towards Robust Model-Based Reinforcement Learning Against Adversarial CorruptionChenlu Ye, Jiafan He, Quanquan Gu, Tong ZhangICML 2024 · 10 citations
