Finding the Missing-half: Graph Complementary Learning for Homophily-prone and Heterophily-prone Graphs
Yizhen Zheng, He Zhang, Vincent Cheng-Siong Lee, Yu Zheng, Xiao Wang, Shirui Pan
Abstract
Real-world graphs generally have only one kind of tendency in their connections. These connections are either homophily-prone or heterophily-prone. While graphs with homophily-prone edges tend to connect nodes with the same class (i.e., intra-class nodes), heterophily-prone edges tend to build relationships between nodes with different classes (i.e., inter-class nodes). Existing GNNs only take the original graph during training. The problem with this approach is that it forgets to take into consideration the ``missing-half"structural information, that is, heterophily-prone topology for homophily-prone graphs and homophily-prone topology for heterophily-prone graphs. In our paper, we introduce Graph cOmplementAry Learning, namely GOAL, which consists of two components: graph complementation and complemented graph convolution. The first component finds the missing-half structural information for a given graph to complement it. The complemented graph has two sets of graphs including both homophily- and heterophily-prone topology. In the latter component, to handle complemented graphs, we design a new graph convolution from the perspective of optimisation. The experiment results show that GOAL consistently outperforms all baselines in eight real-world datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e8201edb-3ee9-44ed-9819-58de5e3716a6Cited by top-tier papers22
- Towards Self-Interpretable Graph-Level Anomaly DetectionYixin Liu, Kaize Ding, Qinghua Lu, Fuyi Li et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 104 citations
- Large Language Models-guided Dynamic Adaptation for Temporal Knowledge Graph ReasoningJiapu Wang, Kai Sun, Linhao Luo, Wei Wei et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 82 citations
- ARC: A Generalist Graph Anomaly Detector with In-Context LearningYixin Liu, Shiyuan Li, Yu Zheng, Qingfeng Chen et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 73 citations
- PC-Conv: Unifying Homophily and Heterophily with Two-Fold FilteringBingheng Li, Erlin Pan, Zhao KangAAAI 2024 · 67 citations
- GNNEvaluator: Evaluating GNN Performance On Unseen Graphs Without LabelsXin Zheng, Miao Zhang, Chunyang Chen, Soheila Molaei et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 30 citations
Builds on13
- Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional NetworksMing Chen, Zhewei Wei, Zengfeng Huang, Bolin Ding et al.ICML 2020 · 1,910 citations
- Geom-GCN: Geometric Graph Convolutional NetworksHongbin Pei, Bingzhe Wei, Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang, Yu Lei et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,445 citations
- Beyond Low-frequency Information in Graph Convolutional NetworksDeyu Bo, Xiao Wang, Chuan Shi, Huawei ShenAAAI 2021 · 773 citations
- Deep Graph Clustering via Dual Correlation ReductionYue Liu, Wenxuan Tu, Sihang Zhou, Xinwang Liu et al.AAAI 2022 · 300 citations
- Interpreting and Unifying Graph Neural Networks with An Optimization FrameworkMeiqi Zhu, Xiao Wang, Chuan Shi, Houye Ji et al.WWW 2021 · 233 citations
Related papers
- Powerful Graph Convolutional Networks with Adaptive Propagation Mechanism for Homophily and HeterophilyTao Wang, Di Jin, Rui Wang, Dongxiao He et al.AAAI 2022 · 126 citations
- Block Modeling-Guided Graph Convolutional Neural NetworksDongxiao He, Chundong Liang, Huixin Liu, Mingxiang Wen et al.AAAI 2022 · 85 citations
- Node Classification Beyond Homophily: Towards a General SolutionZhe Xu, Yuzhong Chen, Qinghai Zhou, Yuhang Wu et al.KDD 2023 · 17 citations
- Graph Neural Networks with HeterophilyJiong Zhu, Ryan A. Rossi, Anup Rao, Tung Mai et al.AAAI 2021 · 393 citations
- Is Homophily a Necessity for Graph Neural Networks?Yao Ma, Xiaorui Liu, Neil Shah, Jiliang TangICLR 2022 · 295 citations
